Moltmann Argument
Jrgen Moltmann, a German theologian, argues that the Christian understanding of God as a personal God who is present in the world implies that God can suffer. Moltmann's argument is rooted in the idea that God is relational and dynamic, rather than static and unchanging.[footnoteRef:9143] He believes that God is affected by what happens in the world, and that God experiences suffering alongside us. [9143: Jansen, Henry. "Moltmanns View of Gods (Im) mutability: The God of the Philosophers and the God of the Bible." (1994): 284-301.]
One of the main arguments in support of Moltmann's perspective is that if God is truly a personal God who cares about humanity, then it is reasonable to assume that God would feel empathy and compassion for our suffering. This implies that God would be capable of suffering in some way, just as we do.
Another argument in support of Moltmann's perspective is based on the idea that God is not static and unchanging, but rather is actively involved in the world and affected by what happens in it. This implies that God is not immune to the effects of suffering and pain, but rather experiences these things alongside us.
Aquinas
On the other hand, St. Thomas...
…the idea of God as the ultimate source of all goodness.[footnoteRef:14299] [14299: Mauser, Bernard James. "Plantinga and Aquinas on the Viability of the Third Way." Religions 14, no. 2 (2023): 226.]The argument for God's impassibility is based on the idea that God is pure act, without potentiality or deficiency. This means that God is not affected by anything outside of God's nature, and is not subject to emotional or physical states that are caused by external influences. God's perfection and completeness mean that God is not subject to change, and therefore cannot experience emotions like joy, sorrow, or anger, which are…
Bibliography
Jansen, Henry. "Moltmann’s View of God’s (Im) mutability: The God of the Philosophers and the God of the Bible." (1994): 284-301.
Mauser, Bernard James. "Plantinga and Aquinas on the Viability of the ‘Third Way’." Religions 14, no. 2 (2023): 226.
God in Genesis The nature and character of God, as found in the Bible and in human consciousness, is a widely disputed and contested field of debate. The reason for this is the very nature of God as ephemeral and unknowable. Human beings can surmise ideas from God from religious texts and their own experience. However, no human being can claim to know the true nature of God. This fact seems
God of the Old Testament displays many human images, many human emotions. Even though we are after all created in His image it still shocks one to read of an angry God or a vengeful God. God seems to play favorites often. We must keep in mind that the Bible was written by man. Man wrote of God in the only manner he could - in human terms. Moses wrote the
God and Creation Has the concept of God well and truly woven itself into the very psyche of the average American citizen? What exactly does the average American think about God? As a matter of fact, each and every American must take some time to sit back and think deeply about these issues, and also pay close attention to the power and influence of God in the history of America. Perhaps
Medea: Since Medea was born as the Princess of Colchis and the niece of Circe, she was a powerful sorceress. Medea fell in love with Jason through the little help she received from Hera when on his quest for the Golden Fleece. Medea helped Hera to steal the sacred artifact for her beloved and received abduction in return. Medea had numerous adventures in her life including murdering her brother to distract
God and Science The art of philosophy, demonstrated throughout history in all its arguments, present certain obstacles and contextual distortion for the state of humanity. There is no doubt it is worthwhile then, to examine some of the most troubling and difficult philosophical issues of the day. The idea of God and its role in humanity and its science will probably never be settled however the discussion itself helps create new
Nietzsche pressed humanity to realize that God is an invention of human creativity, and that we can no longer accept the idea of a divine being outside of ourselves. This was the center of his anthropocentric ideas. Feuerbach and Marx both held beliefs that agreed with Nietzsche (Jeff 19). Marx even referred to religion as the opium of the people. Kant's ideas of reason come back to haunt him
Our semester plans gives you unlimited, unrestricted access to our entire library of resources —writing tools, guides, example essays, tutorials, class notes, and more.
Get Started Now