Verified Document

Appreciative Inquiry How Does Responsible Conduct Factor Essay

Related Topics:

Appreciative Inquiry How does responsible conduct factor into the use of appreciative inquiry as a vehicle for organizational change? The four components of responsible conduct, which are individual attributes, organizational structure, organizational culture, and societal expectations, all contribute to the structure of an environment that is supportive of ethical conduct (Cooper, 2006). As an approach for organizational change, appreciative inquiry engages all of these components in order to achieve a process characterized by positive change. This change is based in perceptions and experiences characterized by factors such as achievements, assets, innovations, and elevated thoughts, to name a few (Cooperrider & Whitney, 2005).

Appreciative inquiry views organizational functioning from a holistic perspective, in which the whole organization defines the smaller individual parts, rather than the other way around (Hammond 1996). Rather than focusing on what is wrong or needs fixing with an organization, the concept underlying appreciative inquiry is to instead remain centered on what is working, and appreciative inquiry is a questioning process comprised of a series of statements that create a vision as to where an organization aims to be in the future based on moments in the past that have similar qualities to these future aims (Hammond, 1996). Individuals reflect on the past in order to recall and in a sense relive moments of success in the past that were energizing and take the essence of these moments to set goals and aims for the future with positive energy (Hammond, 1996).

The change created through the process is not focused on getting to any particular result, instead the focus is on the actual changing, or the process as it is unfolding (Barrett, 2008). This process is experienced through a group of people coming together to share ideas, opinions, and past successful moments with the aim of tapping into a natural capacity for change and cooperation (Barrett & Fry, 2008). Appreciative inquiry brings attention and awareness to the generative potential of conversations focused around perceptions of success and positive energy (Barrett & Fry, 2008).
There are several distinctive characteristics associated with appreciative inquiry that enhance the capacity for cooperation experienced by those taking part in this organizational process, as outlined by Barrett & Fry (2008). Firstly, appreciative inquiry is based in the idea that all systems have strengths and primarily radiate well-being and health. This is opposed to the common practice to focus on lack, problems and disease when exploring change within a system. Therefore, appreciative inquiry uses deliberate positive approaches, such as focusing on assets, metaphors, and musings that carry an energy of potency and vitality (Barrett & Fry, 2008).

The second distinctive characteristic…

Sources used in this document:
References

Barrett, F.J., Fry, R. (2008). Appreciative Inquiry: A Positive Approach to Building Organizational Capacity. Taos Institute Publications. ISBN-13:978-0-7880-2163-3.

Cooper, T.L. (2006). The Responsible Administrator: An Approach to Ethics for the Administrative Role, 5th edition. San Fransisco: Jossey-Bass. ISBN-13:978-0-7879-7651-4.

Cooperrider, D.L., Whitney, D. (2005) Appreciative Inquiry: A Positive Revolution in Change. San Francisco: Berrett-Koehler Publishers.

Hammond, S.A. (1996). The Thin Book of Appreciative Inquiry. Thin Book Publishing Co. ISBN 0-9665373-1-9-2.
Cite this Document:
Copy Bibliography Citation

Related Documents

Special Education Director Leadership Styles
Words: 11099 Length: 40 Document Type: Thesis

More importantly, our appreciative and participatory stance with our co-researchers has allowed us to witness and learn about the cutting edge of leadership work in such a way that is and feels qualitatively different from other research traditions we have used in the past, because it is built on valuing. Even though it is challenging at times (Ospina et al. 2002), our inquiry space is enhanced by our collaboration

Cloud Computing Will Be Discussed to Show
Words: 9986 Length: 26 Document Type: Research Proposal

cloud computing will be discussed to show that the good outweighs the bad. Furthermore, it will be further discussed that the government is looking into using cloud computing because it will cut IT cost down and increase capabilities despite the fact people are concerned with security issues that this may bring to the public. In completing a dissertation, it is very hard to go through the challenges that it requires.

Ethics in Nanomedicine the Term
Words: 10726 Length: 40 Document Type: Term Paper

All these charters that have clearly defined the boundaries of what both the positive i.e. natural rights and negative i.e. The unjust exploitative rights of the people are and how no institution or research domains have the right or power to violate them (Dierkes, Hoffmann and Marz, 1996). Based on the above fact, we have to consider all the concerns related towards security of an individual as well as his

Carl Rogers Core Conditions for Therapy
Words: 3534 Length: 10 Document Type: Term Paper

Person-Centered Therapy Today A sign on the restaurant wall where I lunched today reads, "What you call psychotic behavior ... we call company policy." A joke, obviously, but it set me thinking about differences in the world today compared to the 1950s when Carl Rogers was developing person-centered therapy. Take a small thing like "multi-tasking," for example. In the 1950s a person who drove down an expressway at 70+ miles

Sign Up for Unlimited Study Help

Our semester plans gives you unlimited, unrestricted access to our entire library of resources —writing tools, guides, example essays, tutorials, class notes, and more.

Get Started Now