Anti-trust Legislation believe that anti-trust legislation should be reformed. The main reasons for it are that the 19th century antitrust laws, i.e. Sherman Act, 1890 and Clayton Act, 1914, currently cannot be applied successfully in 21st century computer and telecommunications marketplace (Glanz, 33). This became evident in the case between Microsoft and the Justice Department. The biggest problem was that the Justice Department was applying 19th century law on the computer business, without heeding the fact that the nature of technology is different from that of the traditional goods. For example, Microsoft currently licenses its Windows operating system to PC makers on condition that they must also use its Internet browser Explorer. However, according to the Justice Department it was a monopoly, a clear case of antitrust legislation, even though it was evident that an integrated suit of technology makes economic as well as common sense. The other reason for reforming the antirust legislation is that government often cannot know the complexities of present day business, so any interference of government in business has a direct negative effect on the competitiveness of the firm. At a time, when businesses are competing globally, application of 19th century antitrust legislation is unlikely to make the playing field equal; it would rather erode the very foundation of the capitalism. Undoubtedly, government should ensure the fairness of competition for all of the companies and ensure that a company does not stall the entry of other companies in a business, however, government should also reconsider how and which kinds of firms are best suited for the application of the traditional laws (Reich, 302). If government does not reconsider or reform traditionally formulated legislations, the government is likely to make bad choices.
References
Glanz, William, "Digital Dirty Dozen," Insight on the News, Vol. 18, Issue 10, (2002): 33.
Reich, Robert B. The Work of Nations: Preparing Ourselves for the 21st Century, New York, Knopf, 1991: 301-305.
Anti-Trust Law Analyze and criticize the statement: The strategy of the Sherman Anti-Trust Act and other U.S. antimonopoly legislation is to ensure that each company has meaningful competitors in every product market in which it participates. This strategy works to prevent monopoly pricing of products but unfortunately it is inadequate to prevent the development of quasi-political control of entire societies by oligopolies whose member corporations share a quasi-political agenda. Therefore, as
One of the reasons it is against the anti-trust laws to do this is because it places large businesses like Wal-mart and Microsoft at an unfair advantage because they have enough capital to get through lean times caused by below cost pricing long enough to drive the small business competitors out of business. Many states have laws against selling gasoline below a legal limit that is set by the government for
Anti-Trust Are investors' legal remedies enough? During the 1990s, a wave of legislation substantially deregulated the financial industry, effectively limiting the ability of investors to seek legal remedies in the wake of corporate fraud, and freeing corporations to take greater risks with 'other people's money.' The Private Securities Litigation Reform Act of 1995 (PSLRA) overturned the protections once provided by the 1934 Securities Exchange Act (Nations 2012). Then-President Clinton vetoed PSLRA, and
Sports and Anti-Trust Is the National Football League's Requirements to Enter the Draft a Violation of Antitrust Law? If so why? Why does the NFL think it is not a violation? Defining the AntiTrusts Legislation Sherman AntiTrust Legislation Clayton Antitrust amendment Presidential support The Maurice Clarett Case The NFL's position, The effect is could have on the game. Judge Scheinin's decision Sherman Antitrust Act Clayton Act Basis of Judge Shira Scheinin's Decision Other cases from other Professional sports leagues, like the NBA, that are
AP Wire. (8 Mar 2005) "Anti - Monopoly Agency Rules Against Intel. The New York Times. Business News. Retrieved 8 Mar 2005 at http://www.nytimes.com/aponline/business/AP-Japan-Intel.html One of the central concerns regarding government regulation of businesses and the establishment of monopolies is to protect the consumer by creating an open sphere of market competition. But what of a marketplace where a non-sanctioned monopoly has ensued where the consumer is not being unduly harmed?
Antitrust Legislation and Healthcare The Sherman Anti-Trust Act (1890) was designed to promote competitive practices in the marketplace and protect consumers from price gouging and other egregious practices generated from a lack of competition in monopolistic markets. It was not originally designed to impact the healthcare market but over the years its protections have been extended to do so Strengths Antitrust and anticompetitive laws were not always applied to physician and healthcare conduct.
Our semester plans gives you unlimited, unrestricted access to our entire library of resources —writing tools, guides, example essays, tutorials, class notes, and more.
Get Started Now