Gallic Campaigns
Caesar's Gallic Campaigns
Caesar's Gallic Campaigns
Julius Caesar was an ambitious and ruthless man. He did not begin by attempting to conquer the world, as had Alexander the Great[footnoteRef:1], but he did have the political ambition to at least rule the Roman state as emperor. He had been a consul for several years and upon the end of his term, he was without anything to do. So, through influence he was able to secure the governorships of Cisalpine Gaul, Illycrium and Transalpine Gaul[footnoteRef:2]. With these governorships he hoped to secure enough glory for himself that he could return to Rome in triumph and be welcomed as the emperor[footnoteRef:3]. With these ambitions, and the supposed uprising of the Helvetii, the scene was set for Julius to campaign in Gaul and return to Rome as the conquering hero. Following is a year-by-year account of the Caesar's campaigns from 58 BC to their end in 50 BC, his impressions of the people, with special attention paid to his battles with his most famous foes. [1: Ulrich Wilcken. Alexander the Great. New York W.W. Norton & Co. ] [2: Strabo.Geographia.] [3: Tacitus. Germania]
58 BC
As an adjunct to his campaigns, Caesar kept a detailed account of his battles against the Gallic, German and Briton tribes. He called the tome Commentarii de Bello Gallico, or Commentaries on the Gallic War, and it is regarded as one of the finest historic examples of the type[footnoteRef:4]. However, it is also said that Caesar wrote the book as a self-serving, political treatise that was meant to assist him in bid for further office in Rome[footnoteRef:5]. The account begins by discussing the borders of the three main sections of the territory and the main tribes that live in each[footnoteRef:6]. [4: Athena Review. "Caesar's Campaigns in Gaul (58-50 BC)." Athena Review, 1:4 (2007).] [5: Andrew M. Rigsby. Caesar in Gaul and Rome: War in Words. Austin, TX: University of Texas Press.] [6: Commentarii de Bellum Gallico. Trans W.A. MacDevitt. New York: Everyman's Library, 1915. 1:1]
Two major campaigns took place in the year 58 BC. After Caesar learned that the Helvetii were leaving their traditional homeland and moving closer to the Atlantic seaboard. The route that they had chosen was to cross into the land of the Sequani. The Sequani did not originally want the Helvetii to cross, but after a short period they agreed to allow the Helvetii cross their land. The next issue was that to reach the coast the Helvetii had to go across Roman land[footnoteRef:7]. [7: Athena Review. "Caesar's Campaigns in Gaul (58-50 BC)." Athena Review, 1:4 (2007).]
They crossed the land of the Aedui and Ambarri looting and pillaging as they went. The people were Roman allies and had been for many years, so Caesar determined that it was in his best interest to pursue them. He led a large contingent against the Helvetii as they were crossing the Saone river[footnoteRef:8]. The Helvetii armies were split into four quadrants that must cross the river independently. Caesar allowed the first three divisions to cross without harassment, but as the fourth was waiting to cross Caesar's forces attacked them. He soundly defeated this smaller band[footnoteRef:9], and then set about building a bridge so he could pursue the rest. This tactic of Caesar's was just one of the reasons he is still acclaimed as one of the great generals on world history. He continuously used his smaller force (he rarely had more than 70,000 men at his disposal[footnoteRef:10]) with better field vision and planning than did his enemies[footnoteRef:11]. [8: Commentarii de Bellum Gallico. Trans W.A. MacDevitt. New York: Everyman's Library, 1915. 1:12] [9: Athena Review. "Caesar's Campaigns in Gaul (58-50 BC)." Athena Review, 1:4 (2007).] [10: D'Ooge, Benjamin Leonard & Frederick Carlos Eastman. Caesar in Gaul. New York: Columbia University Press, 1918] [11: Athena Review. "Caesar's Campaigns in Gaul (58-50 BC)." Athena Review, 1:4 (2007).]
It had taken the Helvetii forces 20 days to build a bridge and cross the Saone; it took Caesar just one day to commission the bridge and have it built[footnoteRef:12]. The forces of the Helvetii, as was the case throughout the campaign, had underestimated both the speed and determination of Caesar's legions. After crossing the Saone, he engaged the main force of the Helvetii and defeated them after negotiations and other tactics by the Helvetii nobles failed. After their loss, the Helvetii were ordered by Caesar to return to their original lands. It was his intention that they remain there as a buffer between the German tribes...
Rome One could be important in Roman society either by doing something great, or simply by being born into high status. In other words, Romans valued both accomplishment and privilege. Which of these two do you think was more prominent in Roman society? Argue for one over against the other. Your argument must incorporate an analysis of two things: a specific historical event or institution, and the point-of-view of a Roman
Gaul Classical and Historical Book Review: Caesar, Julius. The Conquest of Gaul. New York: Penguin Books, 1983. The author, Julius Caesar, of The Conquest of Gaul has been variously described as a "Roman patrician, politician, writer, reformer, general, dictator and," according to the decree of the Roman senate, later "a god." (Seindal, 2003) The military leader Julius Caesar's book upon his Gallic conquests famously begins, "Gallia est omnis divisa in partes tres..." Or
After Cato saw that his forces were defeated by Caesar, in traditional Roman fashion, he fell on his sword and committed suicide. Despite this great loss for the Senatorial faction, Pompey's sons Gnaeus Pompeius and Sextus Pompeius, together with Titus Labienus, Caesar's former propraetorian legate (legatus propraetore) and second in command in the Gallic War, escaped to Spain, where they continued to resist Caesar's dominance of the Roman world. Caesar
E. The voices who argue that America should and could be an imperial superpower, but lacks sound practical judgment. The thesis of this paper is that the history of the Roman Empire can be matched to that of the United States in terms of economy, political power, as well as aspirations. In this sense, present day America is very similar to fourth of even fifth century Rome; this poses one stringent
Roman Republic, which took place over a century from the end of the Punic Wars in 146 BC to the establishment of autocracy and military dictatorship under Julius Caesar after 45 BC, and then Octavian-Augustus from 31 BC, one of the most important questions would be: what were the main causes for its failure? There are no simple answers to that, of course, although almost certainly socioeconomic factors were
Our semester plans gives you unlimited, unrestricted access to our entire library of resources —writing tools, guides, example essays, tutorials, class notes, and more.
Get Started Now