MASLOW'S THOERY VS. HULL'S THEORY
Integrating Two Theories of Motivational Psychology
Maslow Hierarchy of needs vs. Hull's Drive Reduction Theory
Motivation is common term, but it is not easily defined. This is due to the many studies, which provide different definitions for the term. While some define it as a set of beliefs, values, interests, others define it as a cognitive decision making process. For this paper, motivation is central to a set of processes, which induce, direct, and maintain actions towards an objective. It is not similar to job performance, but it is a contributor to job performance (Linder, 1980). Motivation is a crucial component in the workplace, which explains why organizations are borrowing concepts from the motivation theories. There are many motivational theories, but they either fall under the content or process categories. Content theories assume that individuals have similar needs, and process theories emphasize the importance of cognitive processes in establishing the level of motivation for individuals. In this regard, this study's objective is to explore two motivational theories; the Maslow hierarchy of needs and Hull's drive reduction theories, and subsequently present a base for the assimilation of the two different theories of motivation.
2. Maslow's Hierarchy of Needs
Maslow's hierarchy of needs is a psychological motivational theory proposed and written by the renowned Abraham Maslow during the Great Depression. The theorist included the theory in his 1943 paper on The Theory of Human Motivation. The theorist wrote the theory based on the conclusions he made after studying the hardships of people who asked for his support. The theory comes with five set of goals, which people endeavor to attain in an effort to satisfy their basic needs (Latham, 2012). Other many things induced Maslow into having such ideas. He was a little Jewish boy in the non-Jewish neighborhood.
This was a little like being the first Negro to be enrolled in an all-white school. In fact, this made him appear isolated and unhappy. His life was lonely, he had no friends, but he grew up in libraries and among books. On the other hand, some works about Maslow reveal that his family was not intact. In this, his father publicly announced that Maslow was ugly, which affected his self-image. His mother, followed suit; similar to the father. Therefore, Maslow grew to hate his parents (Latham, 2012). The readings he did contributed a lot to the development of motivational theories. In fact, motivation has shown to be important since the World War 2.
During the time, employers had not option, but to facilitate the demands of their employees to realize productivity. The theory has made substantial impact in organizations because employers recognize the importance of meeting the needs of their staff to achieve high performance (Latham, 2012). Employees have become essential assets, which explain why their needs, motivation degree, and satisfaction are every employer's priority. Maslow's theory has influenced McGregor's "Theory X and Theory Y" In this context, Theory X comments on the staff being resistant, passive to organizations, particularly when the management does not intervene. He used Maslow's theory to show that Theory x was not appropriate in relation to motivation; therefore, he deduced another theory, "Theory Y"
Analysis of Maslow's Theory
The physiological needs represent the basic human needs, which enhance the survival of the human being. It is the base of the hierarchy, which shows that failure to meet these needs, then, the other needs are non-existent. After realizing the physiological needs, safety needs are the next, which dominate in an individual's behavior. It constitutes of health safety, family safety, and assurance of income. The third level represents the interpersonal needs, and they involve the feeling of belonging (Latham, 2012). Along with the love/belonging, the esteem needs sum up the psychological needs of the individual. The need or desire to feel respected and appreciated are some of the crucial components of the stage. Lastly, there is the self-actualization stage, which defines the person. Owing to this, it qualifies as a self-fulfillment stage.
3. Hull's Drive Reduction Theory
The drive reduction theory comments that behavior is a response to forces or desires such as sexual interest, hunger, thirst and many others. After achieving the desire or goal, there is a subsequent reduction in the drive. Similarly, the theory is central to the principle that organisms are born with particular psychological needs, and there is possible tension, which occurs in case the needs are not met (Hull, 1943). However, when the need is met, the organism returns to homeostasis. In this context, the drive qualifies as a state created through homeostatic disturbance. It...
Theory Y Theory X Theory X / Theory Y Theory X / Theory Y reflects Douglas McGregor's suggestion in The Human Side of Enterprise that managers tend to fall into two categories, in terms of how they see human nature. Theory X managers take a 'carrot and stick' approach when motivating subordinates. They assume that workers are inherently resistant to labor and will do all they can to avoid doing work so
Theory X and Theory Y Select organizational leaders analysis activity current research. Critique leader Douglas MacGregor's Theory X Theory Y Identify proper category leader assessment. Include examples situations actions reflect type leader . Theory X versus Theory Y: Apple vs. Google According to Douglas McGregor' analysis of managerial personality styles, managers fall into two basic 'types,' that of Theory X or Theory Y Theory X managers tend to exert authority through a traditional
Theory X & Theory Y Douglas McGregor's Theory X Theory Y are a set of dichotomous views about human nature that guide management. Theory X holds that humans generally dislike work, are irresponsible and require close supervision to do their jobs; Theory Y holds that humans are generally industrious, creative and able to assume responsibility (eNotes, 2006). These theories are said to guide management styles, because they imply that the role
Theory X and theory Y According to McGregor (1969), Theory X and Theory Y explain describe the differences in management styles and the behavior of leadership. He assumed that the leaders in organization have diverse views on the skills and motivation of the members of organization. Theory X Theory X is a management style which embodies autocratic leadership approach to leadership. The managers who are categorized as a Theory X leaders in general
Theory X and Theory Y When working with people, regardless of the organization, one must be cognizant of the way individuals are motivated. Motivation, in fact, is one of the basic driving forces that allow individuals to work, change, and even actualize their internal and external goals. Much of the background on motivation is based on the work of Maslow, not only surrounding human needs, but the manner in which those
Rather than continually telling people what to do, Theory Y managers believe that people actually want to work and do a good job and that "people will apply self-control and self-direction in the pursuit of organisational objectives, without external control or the threat of punishment" (Chapman 2013). The managers who have applied this philosophy to their leadership and show great trust and confidence in the ability of workers to
Our semester plans gives you unlimited, unrestricted access to our entire library of resources —writing tools, guides, example essays, tutorials, class notes, and more.
Get Started Now