Verified Document

The American Juvenile Justice System Essay

Juvenile Justice System: Contemporary Juvenile Justice System and Juvenile Detention Alternatives Past Issues and Historical Trends in Juvenile Justice

Contemporary juvenile justice is in trouble. For nearly a century, the juvenile justice system was designed to protect young people and provide them with rehabilitation programs and services that would mitigate problems and prevent further delinquency. Young offenders would be treated less as criminals and more as persons in need of assistance, with the state often serving as parens patriae, a de facto parent for wayward youth (Marcus, 2004, p. 1). As effective and compassionate as the juvenile justice system in America was, recent trends in criminal justice have shifted away from separate juvenile proceedings. “Tough on crime” and rhetoric of intolerance has fueled the rise of punitive measures. Punitive measures, such as trying young people in the adult justice system, undermines the core values and intentions of juvenile justice. In fact, research in psychology and brain development show that adolescent brains are structurally different from adult brains. The rehabilitation and prevention model of juvenile justice reflects scientific evidence showing that juveniles are “less blameworthy” and “have a greater capacity to change,” (Juvenile Law Center, 2017).

Originally, the American juvenile justice system was created as a distinct and separate system in order to respond to the need for more sensible treatment for young people. The first formal juvenile justice system evolved in Chicago in 1899. By 1925, most states had some sort of separate juvenile justice structure, system, and process (ACLU, 2017). Throughout the 20th century, juvenile justice processes in the United States were informal in nature, “often nothing more than a conversation between the youth and the judge,” (Juvenile Law Center, 2017). Instead of focusing on the crime or delinquent behavior, the system would focus on the child’s situation including home life. Juvenile justice was also based more on a rehabilitation model. Often, young people would not need an attorney and the judge would make decisions in the best interest of the child (McCord, Widom & Crowell, 2001). Far from being lenient, the traditional model of juvenile justice was designed to advocate on behalf of all young people, while also achieving the public safety goals of the criminal justice system.

The Structure...

The federal government only has direct jurisdiction over cases in which the juvenile committed the offence on federal property like a national park, or within the boundaries of an Indian Reservation (McCord, Widom & Crowell, 2001). Moreover, the federal government and the Office of Juvenile Justice and Delinquency Prevention can withhold funds from states that do not comply with some juvenile justice provisions. For example, states that house juveniles with adults in detention or incarceration facilities, or which hold juveniles for longer than necessary may not receive the funding allocated under the Juvenile Justice and Delinquency Prevention Act (McCord, Widom & Crowell, 2011).
The structure of juvenile justice systems varies from state to state. Generally, states maintain a distinct juvenile court system that is the most central and important structure. Law enforcement officers, state attorneys, probation officers, and juvenile detention centers are also common juvenile justice structures and institutions. Foster care and child protection services may also be involved in the juvenile justice system. With states in control of juvenile justice within their jurisdictions, there is considerable variation in the ways law enforcement will respond to juvenile delinquency, and how delinquents are prosecuted. Furthermore, there is variation between municipalities or counties within the same state (Office of Juvenile Justice and Delinquency Prevention, 2017). The system generally begins with intake and screening, proceeds through investigations and assessments, and finally results in the court decisions related to sanctions. According to Bonnie, Johnson, Chemers,& Schuck (2013), “the juvenile justice process is organizationally complex, value-driven, and often politicized,” (p. 50).

Generally, the juvenile justice systems are specifically designed to divert minors away from the adult criminal justice system. Law enforcement has the discretion to assign a juvenile to an adult court, but state law enforcement officers send the majority of juvenile cases (62%) to juvenile court with another 27% being released (Office of Juvenile Justice and Delinquency Prevention, 2017). Moreover, the local, county, or state law…

Sources used in this document:

References

ACLU (2017). ACLU fact sheet on the juvenile justice system. Retrieved online: https://www.aclu.org/other/aclu-fact-sheet-juvenile-justice-system

Bonnie, R.J., Johnson, R.L., Chemers, B.M. & Schuck, J.A. (2013). Current practice in the juvenile justice system. In Reforming Juvenile Justice. Washington: National Academy Press.

Juvenile Law Center (2017). Youth in the justice system: An overview. Retrieved online: http://jlc.org/news-room/media-resources/youth-justice-system-overview

Office of Juvenile Justice and Delinquency Prevention (2017). Juvenile justice system structure and process. Retrieved online: https://www.ojjdp.gov/ojstatbb/structure_process/case.html

Marcus, P. (2004). The juvenile justice system in the United States. Revue Internationale de Droit Penal 75(1): 535-552.

McCord, J., Widom, C.S. & Crowell, N.A. (2001). The juvenile justice system. Juvenile Crime, Juvenile Justice. Washington, DC: National Academy Press.


Cite this Document:
Copy Bibliography Citation

Related Documents

Juvenile Justice System
Words: 870 Length: 3 Document Type: Research Paper

Juvenile Justice System - Contemporary Juvenile Justice System and Juvenile Detention Alternatives" by William W. Patton (2012) The Fourteenth Amendment to the U.S. Constitution extended the protections afforded by the Bill of Rights to all American citizens, including juveniles. Today, juveniles in the United States, though, are considered special cases that require a different adjudicative approach than that provided adult offenders, but it has not always been this way. In

Juvenile Justice System
Words: 1198 Length: 4 Document Type: Term Paper

juvenile justice system in America. The writer discusses the start of the system and the major changes that have taken place in the system over the past 100 years. There were four sources used to complete this paper. Following events such as Columbine the American public began to demand a re-evaluation of the juvenile justice system in this nation. What many people do not know is that the American juvenile

Juvenile Justice System of China,
Words: 2570 Length: 7 Document Type: Research Paper

Called bang-jiao, it works to rehabilitate juveniles with a community group of parents, friends, relatives and representatives from the neighborhood committee and the police station. Formal rehabilitation is pursued in either a work-study school for juveniles or a juvenile reformatory. The emphasis for both is education and light or labor work (Ibid., 155-156). China officially banned capital punishment for youth who were under 18 at the time of committing the

Juvenile Justice System Do You
Words: 2287 Length: 5 Document Type: Term Paper

In principle, the United States should follow international treaties only if it is a signatory to that specific treaty. However, the Supreme Court of the United States cannot ignore international standards completely either. There are several reasons for this. The world is becoming more and more globalized. Large numbers of immigrants have flocked to the United States in the last several decades and likewise American military and the FBI increasingly

Juvenile Justice System Is More Than a
Words: 677 Length: 2 Document Type: Discussion Chapter

Juvenile justice system is more than a century old, there are still significant controversies involved in terms of public policy and specific penalties. This is especially the case with severe crimes that, in adult courts, would result in life without parole or the death penalty. In the juvenile system, public policy has at best been somewhat confused regarding the best way to penalize youthful persons who engage in severe criminal

Crime As Schmalleger Explains, the American Juvenile-Justice
Words: 1570 Length: 5 Document Type: Term Paper

Crime As Schmalleger explains, the American juvenile-justice system was designed a century ago to reform kids found guilty of minor crimes, but more and more, the system has to cope with more violent crimes committed by younger people. The response on the part of lawmakers has been largely to siphon the worst of these young people out of the juvenile system by lowering the age at which juveniles charged with serious

Sign Up for Unlimited Study Help

Our semester plans gives you unlimited, unrestricted access to our entire library of resources —writing tools, guides, example essays, tutorials, class notes, and more.

Get Started Now