Amending the U.S Constitution
To solve the problems within Congress and the law-making procedure, the term limits must be applied to the positions of Congress through Amending the Constitution of the United States. There are specific reasons as to why the amendment is required as a separate law. In the Marbury VS Madison case, Judge Marshal declared that any law which contradicts the present constitution would be considered void, which is rational since all the parties are governed using the constitution (Judicial Review or Judicial Activism? Marbury v. Madison (1803)). So, the term limit law cannot be passed and only amended that which exists within the constitution.
In U.S. Term Limits, Inc. v. Thornton's case, Arkansas' State Constitution prohibited the participation in the Congress election. This prohibition was for the members who have already served three times in the House of Representatives or two times in the Senate. This prohibition was overruled by the Judge as being inconsistent with the constitution that has already set a standardized eligibility criteria to be followed (U. S. TERM LIMITS, INC., et al., PETITIONERS 93-1456 v. RAY THORNTON et al. WINSTON BRYANT, ATTORNEY GENERAL OF ARKANSAS, PETITIONER 93-1828). In this case. Even the Judge declared that the state could not make their amendments, if the changes are needed, the amendments in the constitution of United States has to be done, so there are no contradictions or violations of the existing clauses (U. S. TERM LIMITS, INC., et al., PETITIONERS 93-1456 v. RAY THORNTON et al. WINSTON BRYANT, ATTORNEY GENERAL OF ARKANSAS, PETITIONER 93-1828).
Concerning these two cases, amending the U.S. Constitution would be necessary as there are already set criteria for the Representatives and Senates that include their age, citizenship, and inhabitance as the sole criteria for electing the Congress, any new law imposing term limits will be inconsistent with the set criteria. Secondly, to add more qualifications/impositions is not within the power of the State's, which is only responsible for the regulations of elections (U.S. Term Limits, Inc. v. Thorton). These two reasons suggest that amendments through the proper procedure will serve the purpose of...
…Suffrage in the Senate." (Article V and the amendment process). So in a state convention method, the amendment needs the ratification of three-fourths of the state's convention, which is chosen by Congress, while for the congressional method, two-thirds of Congress would be required to ratify it (Article V and the amendment process).The three branches of government include; federal, Legislative, and Judicial. The federal branch is the leading executive branch, responsible for enforcing the laws which are elected by the people and have a four-year term (Three Branches of Government). The Legislative branch, which is also known as Congress, is responsible for making the laws that are voted and discussed within Congress. It is divided into two parts; Senate and the House of Representatives (Three Branches of Government). The third part of the government, which is judicial, deals with the interpretation of laws as per the constitution (Three Branches of Government). Imposing term limits on Congress will enable more policymaking as fresh people with new ideas will be given a chance (Burgat, 2018). As the law-making process is done by Congress, better laws…
References
Article V and the amendment process. (n.d.). Khan Academy. Retrieved from https://www.khanacademy.org/humanities/us-government-and-civics/us-gov-foundations/us-gov-ratification-of-the-us-constitution/a/article-v-and-the-amendment-process
Brannon, V. C. (2018). Statutory Interpretation: Theories, Tools, and Trends; CRS Report. Congressional Research Service.
Burgat, C. (2018, January 18). Five Reasons to Oppose Congressional Term Limits. Brookings.
Constitutional Amendment Process. (n.d.). National Archives. Retrieved from https://www.archives.gov/federal-register/constitution
Judicial Review or Judicial Activism? Marbury v. Madison (1803). (n.d.). Bill of Rights Institute. Retrieved from https://billofrightsinstitute.org/educate/educator-resources/lessons-plans/landmark-supreme-court-cases-elessons/marbury-v-madison-1803/
Three Branches of Government. (n.d.). Harry S. Truman Library and Museum. Retrieved from https://www.trumanlibrary.gov/education/three-branches/three-branches-of-government
U. S. TERM LIMITS, INC., et al., PETITIONERS 93-1456 v. RAY THORNTON et al. WINSTON BRYANT, ATTORNEY GENERAL OF ARKANSAS, PETITIONER 93-1828. (n.d.). Legal Information Institute. Retrieved from https://www.law.cornell.edu/supct/html/93-1456.ZO.html
U.S. Term Limits, Inc. v. Thorton. (n.d.). Case Briefs. Retrieved from https://www.casebriefs.com/blog/law/constitutional-law/constitutional-law-keyed-to-sullivan/national-powers-and-local-activities-origins-and-recurrent-themes/u-s-term-limits-in
Constitution The United States Constitution is based on the self-interest view of human nature. It was created to provide people with a large number of freedoms. When the Founding Fathers sat down to write it, they carefully considered all the issues that they and their fellow countrymen had faced when they were still in England, before they came to America to have the freedoms they wanted (Billias, 2009). Because they knew
Constitution for a Club Rules and laws are a vital component of any civilized society. No human community can function effectively without them. All areas of life are governed by some sort of rule. In general society, for example, there are governmental laws in the form of the constitution and the law. There are also rules in the workplace and at school, as well as in less formal environments such as
As a result, the Bill of Rights was implemented into the Constitution, to address the concerns of anti-federalists. While at the same time, it gave the federalists a strong central government that could adjust with: the various changes. This is significant, because it shows how the Constitution is a working document that seeks to provide a balance between: personal freedoms and the need to protect the nation. In many ways,
Male voters had to own property. Thus voting was still the province of land-holding elites rather than all the people under the rule of constitutional, national, and state law. The fact that Senators were appointed by the state legislature not only allocated more rights to the states as desired by Southerners, but also further filtered the popular voice, as expressed in the House of Representatives. The Electoral College system
Constitution Collective Bargaining -- Labor relations Topic: constitution a national union Essay Question: What importance constitution a national union? How dictate internal government procedures union? Essay 250 words length APA format. What is the importance of the constitution of a national union? How does it dictate the internal government and procedures of the union? The constitution of a national union dictates the rules that member unions must follow if these branches are to
Constitution / Democracy For a fully-functioning democracy to work well as a government process, one must remember that the requirement of checks and balances must be in place, otherwise the threat of an oligarchy or -- at worst case scenario -- a tyranny can displace said democracy. The creation of the Bill of Rights and the formation of the U.S. Constitution, then, is an inevitable process and the document that constitutes
Our semester plans gives you unlimited, unrestricted access to our entire library of resources —writing tools, guides, example essays, tutorials, class notes, and more.
Get Started Now