Verified Document

Alfred Lord Tennyson's The Palace Essay

43). In critiquing the Palace of Art Brunner offers common-sense substance that some previous critics had avoided. He claims that the poem demonstrates "to live in art…is to live for selfish delight" and living in selfish delight is not "Godlike" but instead it is like living in hellish mode. The truth about Tennyson is that he is rarely satisfied with "mere accurate observations of states of mind," Brunner continues (p. 43). Brunner should know, and certainly does, that Tennyson's refusal to be satisfied with mere observations is not unique to him, or to poets. Creative artists in all mediums are rarely satisfied with the status quo or with doing what is expected.

Result of the Problem / Discussion

In the Palace of Art, Tennyson is showing his "moral worldview," according to Brunner. But any close review of the poem -- even for a layperson -- brings to mind the possibility that the intense love of beauty and leisure can bring about a self-love. And too much self-love means that the poet is...

Perhaps Tennyson is saying that in the end, God will stand in judgment of art and artist, but that is what purveyors of religious beliefs have been saying for centuries, so Tennyson surely had something deeper in mind. Or just as easily it could be assumed that Tennyson was just putting forth a challenge to the reader that basically said: here it is, I did it, you digest it any way you want to or are able to.
Works Cited

Brunner, Larry. "I Sit as God'? Aestheticism and Repentance in Tennyson's 'The

Palace of Art.'" Renascence: Essays on Values in Literature, Vol. 56 (2003).

Cronin, Richard. "The Palace of Art and Tennyson's Cambridge." Oxford Journals,

XLIII (3), 195-210.

Kincaid, James R. "Tennyson's Major Poems: The Comic and Ironic Patterns." Victorian

Web. Retrieved February 16, 2010, from http://www.victorianweb.org.

Ricks, Christopher B. Tennyson. Berkeley: University of California Press, 1989.

Woolford, John. "The Critique of Romantic Solipsism in Tennyson's 'The Palace of Art.'" the Review of English Studies, 57(232) (2006).

Sources used in this document:
Works Cited

Brunner, Larry. "I Sit as God'? Aestheticism and Repentance in Tennyson's 'The

Palace of Art.'" Renascence: Essays on Values in Literature, Vol. 56 (2003).

Cronin, Richard. "The Palace of Art and Tennyson's Cambridge." Oxford Journals,

XLIII (3), 195-210.
Web. Retrieved February 16, 2010, from http://www.victorianweb.org.
Cite this Document:
Copy Bibliography Citation

Related Documents

Rousseau, Douglass, Both Prose Writers; Whitman, Tennyson
Words: 1303 Length: 4 Document Type: Term Paper

Rousseau, Douglass, both prose writers; Whitman, Tennyson and Wordsworth, all three, poets. What bind them together, what is their common denominator? Nationalism, democracy, love for the common man, singing praises for the ordinary man on the street, fighting for the rights of the poor, seeking the liberation of the downtrodden from oppression, glorifying the human being - man! These are elements that are common to them. Jean Jacques Rousseau Consider Jean-Jacques Rousseau

Sign Up for Unlimited Study Help

Our semester plans gives you unlimited, unrestricted access to our entire library of resources —writing tools, guides, example essays, tutorials, class notes, and more.

Get Started Now