It appears that they were not aware of the situation with Williams when it came to the mental illness and the child abuse, but it is also possible that they kept silent about the issue against an attorney that they knew to be incompetent in order to get a conviction. Speculation is all that is available on that issue where the prosecution is concerned since accounts of what happened to Alexander Williams do not indicate whether the prosecution had knowledge of the mental health problems that Williams had and/or the abusive home that he came from.
THE ATTORNEY'S INVESTIGATION
Perhaps this section should be more appropriately called 'the attorney's lack of investigation,' as that is largely what took place. There were many mitigating circumstances that surrounded Alexander Williams and the murder that he committed, but the incompetent attorney that was assigned to him failed to investigate any of them (Juvenile, 2002). It is unfortunate that the attorney that was available to him thought so little of Alexander Williams that he chose not to even bother to investigate the boy's background in order to determine whether there was some reason that his client should be spared. While no literature really discusses it and it cannot be proven, it almost appears as though the attorney for Alexander Williams wanted Williams to receive the death penalty.
THE LACK OF APPEAL
The attorney that was supposed to meet with Alexander Williams for a re-trial never appeared (Georgia, n.d.). Because of this, Williams simply remained on death row -- just another condemned murderer receiving no treatment for his mental health problems other than to be forcefully medicated so that he could be considered sane enough to be executed (Executing, 2002). Even though there are regulations in many states that prohibit the execution of mentally retarded individuals, these laws do not protect against the and other advocacy groups had finally discovered the truth about Alexander Williams, his incompetent attorney, and the problems that were seen in the case (Death, 2005). His sentence was commuted in February of 2002 to a sentence of life in prison, but his life was cut short in November of 2002 when he took his own life.
CONCLUSION
It is very tragic that Williams committed suicide in November of 2002 (Georgia, n.d.). His life had been spared and he had been moved off of death row and into prison in February of that year. It was commendable that this took place in an effort to correct a past mistake, but William's death indicates that not enough was done to protect him even once he was moved to prison. It is likely that the extent of his mental illness was still not really recognized and this could have been what brought him to the conclusion that it was necessary to end his own life. Whether Williams was being medicated for his problems at the time of his death has not been mentioned. It brings a very tragic end to a story that was already full of tragedy and pain.
WORKS CITED
Death penalty and people with mental illness. (2005). National Mental Health Association. Retrieved 24 February 2005 from http://www.nmha.org/position/deathpenalty / juvcasestudy.cfm
Executing Alexander Williams (2002, February 19). Chicago Tribune. CrimeLynx. Retrieved 24 February 2005 from http://www.crimelynx.com/alexw.html
Georgia Moratorium Campaign. (n.d.) Alexander Williams: A case for moratorium. Retrieved 24 February 2005 from http://www.georgiamoratorium.org/alexwilliams.html
Juvenile death penalty Alex Williams (2002). American Bar Association, reprinted with permission from Amnesty International. Retrieved 24 February 2005 from http://www. abanet.org/crimjust/juvjus/williamsua02.html
Also, the death penalty still in use in a great deal of countries might provide another subject for debate from the point-of-view of human rights. A minimalist set of human rights, meant only to keep people safe from humiliation and pain cannot be effective. This is mainly because while certain human rights seem to be of little necessity, they are actually indispensable. Economic, civil, and political rights are of great
Jesus' Teachings, Prayer, & Christian Life "He (Jesus) Took the Bread. Giving Thanks Broke it. And gave it to his Disciples, saying, 'This is my Body, which is given to you.'" At Elevation time, during Catholic Mass, the priest establishes a mandate for Christian Living. Historically, at the Last Supper, Christ used bread and wine as a supreme metaphor for the rest of our lives. Jesus was in turmoil. He was
More recently two schools of military history have developed that attempt to consider its object from a more eclectic, objective perspective, dubbed the "New Military History" and "War and Society" history. New Military History "refers to a partial turning away from the great captains, and from weapons, tactics, and operations as the main concerns of the historical study of war," and instead focusing on "the interaction of war with society,
The United States Supreme Court ruled in favor of Illinois and argued that the Fourteenth Amendment was designed to protect against race discrimination only…" Gibson, 2007, Background to Muller v. Oregon section ¶ 1). The Court ruled that the Fourteenth Amendment did not include the protection of women's rights. The following depicts Justice Bradley's concurring opinion regarding Bradwell's Man is, or should be, woman's protector and defender. The natural and proper
The first is an arrogant pre-tension falsified by the contradictory opinions of all Rulers in all ages, and throughout the world: the second an unhallowed perversion of the means of salvation" (Boston). Madison's document was successful in crushing Henry's measure, as opposition flooded the Virginia statehouse from every corner of the commonwealth, and the bill was voted down (Boston). Using this momentum, Madison pushed Jefferson's "Act for Establishing Religious Freedom"
Competency 1 Historical problems were managed in the evolution of the U.S. Constitution through the working out of the system of rights that the states would have vs. the rights that would belong to the federal government. In the early days, it was very much a battle between those who wanted a strong central government (the Federalists) and those who wanted strong states (the Anti-Federalists). The Federalists were led by men
Our semester plans gives you unlimited, unrestricted access to our entire library of resources —writing tools, guides, example essays, tutorials, class notes, and more.
Get Started Now