Alexander -- the Great
Alexander, who was the son of Phillip II, sat on the throne of Macedon when he was 22 years of age. Between his twenty third and thirty third birthday, in a period of ten years, he conquered most of the known civilizations of the world, from Indus to the Adriatic Sea. (Southern Utah University, 2005)
The history indicates that these conquests of Alexander became possible because of his remarkable personality and military genius. He is regarded as mystery to the world as he has not left behind any diary, formal discourse on the art of war or theory of monarchy. All the world has are some parts of his speech, fragments of his conversations and a number of stories that depicted his various abilities and hi intelligence. (Southern Utah University, 2005)
Alexander's biography tells the world very little about this man. His biography indicates that he could be charming by all accounts when it served his purpose. He is described as charming while he communicated with his soldiers, charismatic when he intended to impress someone and highly ruthless when cruelty was the best possible option. (Southern Utah University, 2005)
Alexander was favored by the society because of commendable intelligence, looks and confidence. According to Plutarch, as mentioned in the research of Southern Utah University (2005), 'He was fair and of a light color passing into ruddiness in his face. He carried his head tilted slightly towards his left shoulder, his eyes often looking up as if communing with some unseen presence.' (Southern Utah University, 2005)
It has been indicated by a number of studies that major motivators behind Alexander's power were his military expertise, great intellect and strategy development skills and his desire to control the world. (The Motivations of Alexander the Great: What motivated the famous general as he was conquering the world?, 2013)
Alexander's Military Expertise
The world that was left behind by Alexander regarded this great king as an exceptional military success. The successors of Alexander tried very hard to achieve the military expertise that was achieved by him but all of them failed. The Romans greatly respected his military powers and they also tried to achieve his glory. (Overtoom, 2011)
Alexander is regarded as one of finest military leaders who finely led the wars that took place before the advent of gun powder. The strategies and plans of Alexander were based on genius. Alexander was born as the successor of the throne of a kingdom that was located at the boundary of the Greek world. He deployed the military power developed by his father to conquer the Persian Empire and landed the flags of his empire on the Indus River. (Gabel and Willbanks, 2011)
Most Contagious Military Campaign
The battles of Alexander were masterpieces in tactical terms. The most commendable characteristic of Alexander as a military leader was that he very fluently used decisive and personal decision making and leadership skills at critical times in the battlefield. (Gabel and Willbanks, 2011)
Alexander the great is perhaps one of the most famous names in the history of the world. Some of the authors state that his name is synonymous with military glory. He conducted the most contagious and extended military operation of the history which extended for almost ten years. During the course of this campaign he conquered an area that stretched from east to west and then the Continental United States. (Gabel and Willbanks, 2011)
Alexander spent his entire adulthood, from the age of sixteen year to the age of thirty two, at war. He fought hundreds of battles against a large number of rivals who had expertise over a number of military practices and the most astonishing fact is that he won all these battles. (Gabel and Willbanks, 2011)
Personal Leadership Skills
His empire was the largest empire that was ever created in up till his time. He extended his reign over Western Civilization beyond the Indus River and the Himalayas. Beyond being courageous Alexander was also a 'soldier's soldier'. He was not a rigid leader and is known for making personal bonds with his soldiers. He shared the privations and hardships of his soldiers. (Gabel and Willbanks, 2011)
In addition to that, Alexander personally attended to the well being of his soldiers. He shared the spoils of the battle with his soldiers in a generous manner and shared their rough humor in an enthusiastic manner. These are the reasons due to which his soldiers held...
Assyrian Empire vs. The Persian Empire Although both, the Assyrian and the Persian empires proved to be two of the most famous of their times, there were noticeable differences among them both and what strategies they used to establish their name and carry their empires towards success and leadership. Both of them managed to spread their empires to vast levels and leave traces for the other later empires to follow. The Assyrian
Battle of Platea The Persian Empire was built on the Persian practice of conquer and enslave. The big war machine moved across Asia and Southern Europe conquering peoples and stripping them of any form of self-determination or independent thought. This was the principle that set the scene for the Battle of Platea in 479 AD The success of the Persian army was built on the principle of taking the best from
Economy of Persian Society: Darius and Xerxes Under Darius, the Persian Empire was at its height and its economy flourished. The lands and people he conquered paid taxes or tributes to him, most willingly, because he, like Cyrus, was tolerant of their cultures. The expansion of the Persian road system allowed for easier travels and a mail system to develop which facilitated trade and the moving of coin. Indeed, Darius
Thus, the Spartans were now free, along with the disgruntled Persians, who had a significant ax to grind with Athens, to seize the opportunity and attack Athens (thereby ending the 50 years truce). After a few years of resistance, Athens fell completely, and was immediately subjected to the oligarchical government under Sparta, known as "the Thirty." Although it certainly seems ironic that the very democratic system that the Athenians were so
Persians had such an extensive influence on the development of world history that most Westerners encounter stories of the Persian Empire as Greek historians told them, or alternatively, from Biblical sources. Persian rule enabled the dissemination of ideas related to Zoroastrian worldviews and political philosophy. The Persian Empire is during its peak is known as the Achaemenid Empire, because of the name of the family dynasty beginning with King Cyrus. Cyrus
Persian Wars (490 BCE to 479 BCE) between the Greek city-states and the Persian Empire were predicated by various circumstances, ranging from cultural ideologies to political connivances. For the Greeks, particularly the Ionians and the Athenians, Persian rule was unwanted and unacceptable. The Persian leaders Darius and his son Xerxes, however, following in the example of Cyrus the Great, saw the Greek city-states as puny colonies that were to be
Our semester plans gives you unlimited, unrestricted access to our entire library of resources —writing tools, guides, example essays, tutorials, class notes, and more.
Get Started Now