Ivan Denisovich In Alexander Solzhenitsyn's One Day in the Life of Ivan Denisovich (1962), Special Camp 104 represents the entire Soviet Union in microcosm, as a kind on anti-Utopia or dystopia. In other words, Special Camp 104 is Stalin's Soviet Union, a totalitarian police state in which the population is mostly slave labor, except for those who manage to obtain slightly more privileged positions as overseers through luck, cunning, bribery or connections. As the title indicates, the entire story is told through the eyes of the narrator, Ivan Denisovich Shukhov, Special Prisoner S-854, from the time he wakes up in the morning until he goes to sleep at night. Shukhov is not a great hero or political dissident, but an ordinary Russian peasant who was sent to the camp because he was taken prisoner by the Germans in World War II, contrary to Stalin's orders. As soon as these men were freed from the Nazi camps -- the few who survived -- they ended up in the Soviet GULAG or Chief Administration of Corrective Labor Camps. Like most of the prisoners or zecs in these labor camps. Shukhov was simply an ordinary worker, and during his day his task was to work on the construction site of a power plant. His main concern is not to revolt against the authorities of even protest mildly against the system, but simply obtain enough food, clothing and warmth to continue on another day, and he even takes pride over how much work he can do with so little food. He is not an educated or reflective man and thinks little about the larger political and social questions, but through his seemingly simple narrative the broader outlines of Stalinist society become clear. At the top of the hierarchy is the Boss or Commandant (Stalin) who is never seen and whose name is unspoken, and like a god or monarch he rules over the prison state through a hierarchy of officers, warders, prisoner foreman,...
At the bottom are the masses of workers and peasants like Shukhov, who do all the work and the fighting, are provided with a minimal level of food, clothing and shelter, and are generally treated like cattle.They sank without a trace. No point in telling the family which gang you worked in and what your foreman, Andrei Prokofyevich Tyurin, was like. Nowadays you had more to say to Kildigs, the Latvian, than to the folks at home." (Solzhenitsyn, 1963) Thus, from this point-of-view, Shukhov's attitude changed, as he realizes that despite everything else, the collectivity he had to relate to was now made up of
What make both works similar are the attitudes of the main characters: Zhivago and Shukhov each attempt to make the most of what fate and history have to deal them, although both experience decidedly unfavorable fates. "Shukhov is a 'simple heart,' a beloved type in Russian literature from Turgenev to Tolstoy." (Slonim, 333). Solzhenitsyn's character simplistically seeks out the small and minimal pleasures to be found in his deplorable
Our semester plans gives you unlimited, unrestricted access to our entire library of resources —writing tools, guides, example essays, tutorials, class notes, and more.
Get Started Now