Alamo
In Sleuthing the Alamo, James Crisp does not think that Sam Houston gave the racist "half Indian Mexicans" speech. This is contrary to the fact that the speech has been widely attributed to Sam Houston. "The words of the speech were harsh," as Crisp states it (p. 10). Houston speaks about the "phlegm of the indolent Mexicans," and calls them "half-Indians," thus denigrating both Tejanos and Native Americans," (cited by Crisp). Houston knew that most of the Anglo Texans were already racist and he capitalized on these beliefs to foment fervor for secession and American statehood. Crisp comes across as an apologist, as his "sleuthing" seems like it is done only to vindicate his childhood hero. Yet what he is really trying to say is that historians' own biases were attributing their racist beliefs to Houston. It wasn't Houston that was the real racist; it was the interpreters of history.
The views of society impact the way the Alamo and its historical context are portrayed and remembered in history books. Comics, movies, and paintings present a romantic version of events, told primarily from the Anglo side of the conflict. Whites are good, Mexicans and everyone else are beneath whites. This portrayal is largely because the bulk of authorship for these artifacts is biased. The truth is far more complex than that, as Crisp shows us. Moreover, the experiences of blacks and Native Americans have been silenced in these representations. The...
Our semester plans gives you unlimited, unrestricted access to our entire library of resources —writing tools, guides, example essays, tutorials, class notes, and more.
Get Started Now