Al Qaeda's Next Major Domestic Attack On The United States
The fact that the United States has not experienced a major domestic attack since the terrorist attacks of September 11, 2001 is firm testament to the relentless work by the Western intelligence community in identifying potential threats and preventing them from reaching fruition. In fact, a number of such attempts have been detected and eliminated in recent years, some of which may not even be known by the general public. Moreover, several of Al Qaeda's top leaders have been killed (including Osama bin Laden), but new leaders have emerged to take their place and Al Qaeda continues to represent a major threat to American interests at home and abroad. Indeed, many authorities maintain that such a major domestic attack it is not a matter of "if" but "when," making the need for ongoing surveillance of domestic terrorist activities a national priority. To this end, this paper provides a review of recent intercepted terrorist message traffic together with the relevant literature concerning terrorist forecasting and the use of chemical, biological, radiological, nuclear and explosives to identify the next major domestic attack on the United States. A summary of the research and important findings are presented in the conclusion.
Review and Discussion
Description of Threat Scenario
Based on intercepted message traffic purportedly from Al Qaeda, the following scenario was reconstructed with missing gaps being filled in where appropriate based on an extrapolation of past practices by Al Qaeda and the forecasting methodologies available to intelligence analysts. Based on this analysis, the main themes that emerged from the intercepted traffic that have specific implications for forecasting included the following:
1. The attack will take place on New Year's Eve (January 1) on or about midnight in Times Square, New York City.
2. The perpetrators will be five Afghani nationals with forged Lebanese passports traveling under Christian names, suggesting some level of coordination with terrorist groups in Lebanon. According to Merari, "It is practically impossible to arrest terrorists in countries where they enjoy the protection of the government, and it is almost as difficult to apprehend them in unruly territories such as Lebanon."
3. The five Afghani nationals may be living in a safe house in New York City. This strategy has been used in the past by Al Qaeda to conceal terrorists from Afghanistan in safe houses in the United States where they received instructions on "Americanized" English, as well as training in building detonators and explosive devices.
4. A faked heart attack in the midst of the enormous crowd will prompt the dispatch of an ambulance to the scene.
5. The "ambulance" that responds to the faked heart attack will contain 100 liters of sarin (about 26 gallons) and will be manned by Al Qaeda "suicide bomb" operatives.
6. The perpetrators may seek escape following attack via Canada or through LaGuardia International Airport.
The source of the intercepted transmission remains unclear, but the message content was considered sufficiently credible to warrant preparatory action pursuant to CBRNe terrorist activity as discussed further below.
CBRNe Terrorism
Based on their enormous "bang for the buck" in terms of total human devastation caused, so-called CBRNe devices may be the weapon of choice for some terrorist organizations in the future, assuming they are able to develop the expertise to use them. According to Interpol, "Terrorism that makes use of chemical, biological, radiological, nuclear and explosives (CBRNe) materials is commonly conceived as the worst case scenario of all terrorist attacks."
Despite the rarity of these types of attacks, though, the potential devastation that could be exacted through the use of CBRNe methods by terrorist groups demands diligent oversight, with prevention of the attacks being the major priority.
Although just a small percentage of terrorists possess the skills and resources needed to manufacture sarin, the process itself is not so difficult that it cannot be accomplished by committed individuals. In reality, making sarin is about on the level with making good methamphetamine, and just about as difficult to secure the requisite ingredients. For instance, according to Emsley, "Sarin is easier to make from the commercially available chemical methylphosphonic dichloride, but sales of this are carefully monitored around the world for this reason."
Likewise, its potential for causing widespread casualties is well documented when aerosolized, but like meth, regulation of the ingredients needed to manufacture sarin cannot prevent diligent chemists from securing them in sufficient quantities to manufacture enough of the toxin to kill half a million people or more, especially if they are in a concentrated...
Domestic and International Terrorism The differences between domestic and international terrorism The Federal Bureau of Investigation in America states that terrorism has been classified into two categories as international terrorism and domestic terrorism. Domestic terrorism is defined as an act planned by a group of individuals of evil intentions against the government or against the citizens of the state without any foreign force. On the other hand, international terrorism is a plan
DOMESTIC VS INTERNATIONAL TERRORISM: WHICH IS THE GREATER THREAT? While many Americans today remember the events of September 11, 2001 when international terrorists flew aircraft into the World Trade Center and the Pentagon and killed thousands, fewer will likely remember the largest domestic terrorism event in the nation's history which took place just a few years earlier when Timothy McVeigh bombed the Alfred P. Murrah Building in Oklahoma City on April
The narrow selfishness of these terrorists then relate to the well-being of their families in either the positive or negative sense. They engage in suicidal terrorism to either protect their families from the threat of harm, or to provide them with comfort by means of money. On the other hand, Caplan also notes that suicidal terrorism is extremely rare, and is therefore a greater indicator of self-interest among terrorists than
Drone Strikes Target drone Legality International Law and Drone Strikes Obama Administration Drone attacks in Pakistan Drone Strikes in Yemen Drone Strikes in Somalia The legality of the drone strikes is a disputed matter. A major challenge to the international law and the international system is the U.S. policy of using drones aerially to carry out target killings. According to some reports U.S. drone strikes have killed almost 4,000 people since 2002 in Pakistan, Yemen and other countries.
CURRENT PROBLEMS Governmental officials knew before the September 11 attacks that we were not fully prepared to either deal with a major terrorist attack or to put effective counterterrorism strategies in place (Haynes, 2004). Experts now realize that most standard investigative techniques used by law enforcement are likely to help us infiltrate and neutralize groups such as cells of Al-Qaeda members. The strategies that show the most promise include using informants
U.S. National Strategy What three United States national interests do you think will be at great risk over the next five years? Describe those interests and identify which instruments of national power can be leveraged to protect or advance those national interests and how those instruments can be used. As President Obama stated in his addresses to Congress in February 2009, the most important problem that the country faced was the economy,
Our semester plans gives you unlimited, unrestricted access to our entire library of resources —writing tools, guides, example essays, tutorials, class notes, and more.
Get Started Now