This may be true in that people always have an internal bias in them, about different things. But what becomes the best corrector against race-based hiring is that not having the best employees for a job will cut into profit margins and cause employers to gladly hire African-Americans if they are most qualified for a position. The alternative is to go out of business. What the authors also do not realize is that the market forces are the best forces to ensure equity and employment and not outside artificial interference. The next paragraph will show this.
One of the difficulties in arguing against affirmative action is that any such analysis comes across as racist. But one of the best examples of why affirmative action should be eschewed is professional sports in the United States, where African-Americans have financially benefited in ways that even the wealthiest whites cannot even imagine. Before the civil rights movement, blacks athletes, who were more talented and had a natural instinct for these sports were deliberately kept out of these leagues by racist policies. Sports suffered as a result. But post-segregation, the best at the sports got a chance to play it, spectatorship increased and African-Americans athletes made more money. Affirmative action wasn't and isn't needed because the best play at these sports having undergone a rigorous vetting process that starts at little league, high school and college.
Profit making is critical for any capitalistic economy, which is the best type there is. What proves beneficial to people is competition, and not governmental regulations. What none of the writers of the papers, or for his perfect intentions, Professor Darity, seem to touch on is that African-Americans in this country (of course there are many, many noted exceptions) in general have a poor history of educating them selves, and not taking advantage of educational opportunities that are available through free public schooling. What Stephen Steinberg, himself a Jew (as his last name indicates) does not realize that for Jewish, education is equated with religion. This enables the Jewish to hold jobs that require a higher education, which is the direct line to acquiring wealth....
Hence, it is important for the proper application of the AA idea that those who make the anti-discrimination and AA policies understand both sides of the story and both the discriminator's and the victim's perspectives. So, in essence those groups of people who disagree on certain ideas or approaches towards justice must try to adopt an unbiased approach to understanding the reason behind the existence of the differences and
Affirmative Action is an organization of policies and designed procedures aimed at assisting in the elimination of discrimination against women and other minorities in the human society, together with redressing the possibilities of past discrimination. As required by the Affirmative Action Plan's requirements, Affirmative Action was signed by President Johnson in 1965. It supported and revised by different presidents in the world. The intention of Affirmative Action is to have
Affirmative Action is an extremely important concept since it is vital to the operation of America as a democracy. It reinforces the affirmation of the Constitution that all people are born equal and should, therefore, be given an equal chance to prove themselves. Employment opportunity (and other factors) should be based on merit rather than on extraneous factors such as skin color, race, gender, physiology, and so forth. The Federal Register
Affirmative Action Lit Review Affirmative Action Review of Literature Has Affirmative Action outlived its use in today's society? And if so should the program change or simply come to an end? The issue of Affirmative Action (AA) is one that is currently being hotly debated by both policy makers and the public. Like racism itself there are many opinions all of which are run the gamut between logical and illogical and constructive and
..aims to compensate people for past discrimination and its effects. A main effect of past discrimination is current competitive disadvantage; affirmative action gives victims a competitive advantage to compensate for this injury." (1998) the Discrimination-blocking affirmative action according to Anderson: "...aims to block current discriminatory mechanisms by imposing a countervailing force in the opposite direction. It doesn't remove the factors -- prejudice, stereotypes, stigma, intergroup anxiety -- that cause discrimination;
Affirmative Action At its most objective definition, affirmative action entails "positive steps taken to increase the representation of women and minorities in areas of employment, education, and business from which they have been historically excluded." Affirmative action acknowledges the presence of institutionalized and systematic forms of discrimination: which may not be apparent to members of the dominant or privileged culture. For example, white males will not even notice that no Blacks
Our semester plans gives you unlimited, unrestricted access to our entire library of resources —writing tools, guides, example essays, tutorials, class notes, and more.
Get Started Now