Corporate Social and Environmental Reporting: Greenwashing or Legitimate Accounting Practice?
Corporations have increasingly been viewed as owing a social and environmental responsibility to a wide range of stakeholders, including their employees, shareholders, the communities in which they compete as well as the larger populations they serve. In some jurisdictions, social and environmental reporting is required by law while corporate social and environmental reporting is a voluntary practice. Therefore, when corporations engage in corporate social and environmental reporting, it is clearly intended to further their best interests and image among their stakeholders. For instance, according to one economist, "The main motivation for corporate [social and environmental] reporting ... is to enhance corporate image and credibility with stakeholders" (Adams, 2002: 244-245). This paper reviews the relevant literature to provide the basis for an agreement with Adams' assertion, followed by a summary of the research and important findings concerning corporate social and environment reporting in the conclusion.
Review and Analysis
Corporate social and environmental reporting has been generally defined as the "process of communicating the social and environmental effects of organisations' economic actions to particular interest groups within society and to society at large" (Gray, Owen & Adams, 1996: 3). In short, corporate social and environment reporting is used by organizations to communicate the litany of social and environmental initiatives they have implemented to that have an effect on (a) employee related issues, (b) community involvement, (c) environmental concerns, and, (d) ethical issues, among others (Gray et al., 1996). Therefore, when corporations engage in corporate social and environmental reporting, they are providing information concerning their various interactions with society that are intended to promote targeted social and environmental issues that have relevance for their stakeholders (Gray et al., 1996).
The overarching goals of social and environmental disclosures and reporting by corporations in general are as follows:
1. Gain legitimacy from the external stakeholders;
2. Demonstrate transparency and accountability dimensions of good corporate governance;
3. Enhance and sustain corporate credibility and reputation;
4. Create stakeholder value in the long run;
5. Inform the policy makers and regulators of the active role of the modern corporation in corporate social responsibility;
7. Establish linkage between corporate social and financial performance;
8. Participate in international business with globally compatible business practices focusing on stakeholder engagement;
9. Develop organizational capacity-knowledge, skills, and attitudes for promoting socially responsive business practices; and,
10. Comply with global environmental and sustainability standards (Baxi & Ray, 2009: 357).
Although the foregoing list of goals is far more comprehensive than the introductory assertion by Adams (2002), the foregoing list is highly congruent with his listing the enhancement of corporate image and credibility with stakeholders as the main motivation for corporate social and environmental reporting.
It is important to note, though, that these goals are also the result of several decades of experience with corporate social and environmental reporting. While the practice is not new, there has been increased focus on corporate social and environmental reporting since the turn of the 21st century, but there are some fundamental differences with respect to which corporations are required to perform such reporting as well as the jurisdiction that is involved. For example, according to Baxi and Ray, "The subtle difference between corporate environmental reporting and environmental reporting stems from the fact that the former is voluntary in nature while the latter is mandatory. Across the globe corporate environmental reporting has been voluntary in natur" (2009: 356).
When corporations engage in any type of voluntary practice that costs money, it is also important to determine how these investments of scarce organizational resources are adding value for the corporation's shareholders and fulfilling the responsibilities of the corporation to its stakeholders. In other words, when something is voluntary, there has to be something in it for the corporations, otherwise it would not be in their best interests to do so. In the case of corporate social and environmental reporting, the real value can only be realized if the reporting contains actual social and environmental programs that have achieved their objectives. When this is the case, the return of corporate social and environmental reporting can be significant. For instance, Baxi and Ray point out that, "Environmental management has become important for the companies whose prime objective is to minimize environmental degradation by the companies in various ways like reduction in waste generation,…
Corporate Finance Tools in Daily Life Many of the concepts associated with corporate finance also have applications in everyday life. A range of corporate finance tools are already used in everyday life, often without realization as corporate finance tools are often an extension of common financial practices. More complex corporate finance tools may also provide a great deal of potential to enhance daily life financial management. By looking at task associated
Or that he is to make expenses on dropping pollution outside the quantity that is in the best welfare of the business or that is mandatory by law in order to add to the social objective of improving the atmosphere (Friedman, 1970). Corporate culture has been established as an administration tool. Corporate culture can aid to attain corporate objectives comprising profit enlargement. Advocates of corporate culture as a tool propose
Humana Order Humana's Corporate Finance Analysis In 1992, David Jones, the Chairman and Chief Executive Officer of Humana Inc. considered a major change within its integrated strategy of managing both hospitals and health plans because Jones thought about whether it still made sense for the company to jointly operate both hospitals and health plans, considering emerging trends within the healthcare industry within the United States. However, the Chairman/CEO felt there was more
Business -- Corporate Finance - Net Present Value - Mergers & Acquisitions -- SLP Facebook the Merger of Facebook, Inc. And Twitter, Inc. Choosing a company to merge with Facebook, Inc. is a difficult task because Facebook, Inc. is a huge, valuable, cutting-edge company. When forced to choose a prospect for merger, I would settle on Twitter, Inc. (Yahoo! Finance, 2013). First, both companies are in the Technology/Internet Information Provider field, so
finance and financial entrepreneurship. The basis of the article is on a discussion that was held on this subject among four leading lights of financial entrepreneurship in the United States - Michael Milken, Lewis Ranieri, Richard Sandor and Myron Scholes. These people are famous in their own right and have had a sizeable role in financial entrepreneurship in the U.S. over the last 20 years. We have first discussed
Corporate Governance: A review of Literature What is Corporate Governance? Principles of Corporate Governance Theoretical foundations of corporate governance Agency theory Stewardship theory Stakeholder theory Post-Enron theories Corporate Governance: The changing trends Recent developments on regulatory front and research Corporate Governance: Relationship with market indicators Venture Capital Model: Impact on Corporate Governance Appendix I- Examples of Corporate Governing bodies This paper is a review of pertinent literature on corporate governance. Corporate governance addresses the control issues created due to the separation of ownership
Our semester plans gives you unlimited, unrestricted access to our entire library of resources —writing tools, guides, example essays, tutorials, class notes, and more.
Get Started Now