¶ … Administrative Evil
Review of Unmasking Administrative Evil
In Understanding Administrative Evil, authors Guy B. Adams and Danny L. Balfour explore the idea and evolution of the concept of evil. Adams and Balfour begin by defining historical evil as "knowingly and deliberately inflicting pain and suffering on other human being" (xix).
However, in modern times, this idea has undergone a critical change. Historical evil has evolved into administrative evil, a form of evil that is unique to modernity. Administrative evil is made possible by the rise of technical rationality, a culture that "emphasizes the scientific-analytic mind-set and the belief in technological progress." As a result, administrative evil "wears many masks" (xxi) keeping its nature hidden from the people who unintentionally carry out its plans.
This process of "moral inversion" can thus make public officers the unknowing vehicles of administrative evil.
Thus, the main difference between historical and administrative evil lie in the perpetrator's motivation. In administrative evil, actors are often unaware that they are engaging in evil behavior.
To illustrate their arguments, Adams and Balfour cite numerous and varied cases of administrative evil, including the Jewish Holocaust, welfare reform, immigration and the destructive organizational culture at NASA that spawned the Challenger tragedy. The variety of examples illustrates the power and pervasiveness of administrative evil, and how this new evil could overcome even the most stringent external and professional control mechanisms.
Thus, for Adams and Balfour, the only way to combat administrative evil was through a radical reconstruction of technical rationality. As a society, we should discard procedural and individualistic values in favor of those that are based on substantive and communitarian values.
Methods
To support their argument, Adams and Balfour apply their theory to a number of modern historical events. In their first study, the authors analyze the Holocaust, first by summarizing the debate between intentionalist and functionalist scholars.
However, to fully understand the German society's complicity in the Holocaust, Adams and Balfour argue for a synthesis - that the Holocaust grew out of a "confluence...
Accordingly, Browder notes that "the discipline of public administration has little sense of its historical circumstances and constantly re-issues 'new' calls for science and rigour. Instead, we must focus more research on critical, historically-based studies." (p. 1) Browder argues that the insertion of administrative evil into such discussions provides just such a basis for consideration. Key Scholars: The key scholars of importance in this discussion are Adams & Balfour, whose 1998
Theory Help You to Make Sense of Your Own Organization and the Management Practices in Your Organization? Too often, individuals get an idea stuck in their heads and they cannot dislodge it no matter how hard they try. In actuality though, most people who can only contrive a particular system for working, whether that be managing or running an organization, and there is no interest in change. I realize that
Ford Pinto and Corporate Crime Experts on corporate crime such as David O. Friedrichs (1996) used to lament the lack of attention given to white collar crime. This was due to the mistaken assumption that unlike violent street crimes, white collar crimes were victimless and therefore, less harmful. However, recent events such as the recent Firestone tire blowouts, the rollover of Ford's rollover vehicles and Enron Company's padding of profits and Arthur
Our semester plans gives you unlimited, unrestricted access to our entire library of resources —writing tools, guides, example essays, tutorials, class notes, and more.
Get Started Now