Reduce the Budget Deficit
Statutory budget controls in effect from 1985 to 2002 were designed "to reduce the budget deficit" (Lynch, 2011, p. 1). The Balanced Budget and Emergency Deficit Control Act (1985) and the Budget Enforcement Act (1990) were primary drivers of deficit reduction mechanisms, which provided controls to cap Congressional spending and support to the legislative process with regard to reducing the deficit. The first of these Acts actually enabled Congress to increase the deficit but did so with the stipulation that "gradual reduction" be accomplished over the following six-year period (Lynch, 2011, p. 1). The deficit goals and time allowance were extended in 1987 via the Balanced Budget and Emergency Deficit Control Reaffirmation Act -- essentially a piece of legislation that enabled Congress to kick the can. The 1990 Budget Enforcement Act introduced a pay-as-you-go approach to reducing the deficit and caps on discretionary spending. The Act was altered and extended twice -- in 1993 and in 1997. By the 21st century, the deficit would be exploding as a result of wars and national security growth in the post 9/11 world -- and following the banking implosion...
If anything, these decades showed that Congress was not really doing anything to reduce the deficit: its actions were impotent and the outcomes evident -- the deficit has increased dramatically. Congress is simply dysfunctional (Binder, 2015).
The budget does not exist in a vacuum. The deficit is the result of a number of policies and actions taken by Congress and the White House via Executive Order. Any legislative attempts to reduce the deficit are akin to attempting to tape a decapitated head back onto a body and have it dance. The effect might last for a minute or two, but the head invariably falls off again. What measures are necessary to address spending and revenues are ones that must be incredibly more substantial and cohesive: in short, budget cuts have to be made, wars have to be brought to a halt, spending has to be curtailed and income has to rise. Trump's plan to slash corporate taxes in order to attract more businesses to the U.S. is a good start because it provides a means for the American economy to grow (something it has not…