Verified Document

Actions Lawsuits In Employment Sex-Discrimination Lawsuits: When Essay

¶ … Actions Lawsuits in Employment Sex-Discrimination Lawsuits: When are they Appropriate? The class action lawsuit is a somewhat controversial tool, particularly in the case of employment discrimination. In many ways, it is a hallmark of judicial efficiency. After all, if a number of plaintiffs have the same claim against a defendant, it is inefficient to try the same case a number of times. Moreover, later plaintiffs may be unable to recover if earlier plaintiffs exhaust a defendant's financial resources. Therefore, if a company has an employment policy that is facially discriminatory, or has a readily-provable and consistent disparate impact, class-action litigation can be appropriate. However, in many ways the class actions lawsuit is not well-suited for employment discrimination lawsuits. Employment discrimination, particularly gender-based employment discrimination, is frequently subtle and a finding of discrimination is not going to be based on company policies, but on the treatment of a particular individual. Moreover, it seems that unscrupulous employers find ways to evade anti-discrimination laws, which have also been eroded through some subsequent legislation. "There is a reason that the field of labor and employment law -- both as an academic subject and as an arena of social life -- has declined. That is that the labor and employment laws do not address the concerns or vulnerabilities of the majority of the workforce today" (Stone, 2008).

While the use of this class action mechanism is meant to remedy that inequality, it seems to do so at the expense of the basic proposition of judicial fairness, not only for defendants, but for many of the class members. For example, if a company has discriminatory policies but the plaintiff did not experience gender discrimination, then there is no basis for recovery. These are all important factors to consider when looking at the efficacy of the class action lawsuit in employment discrimination lawsuits, and they all played a role in the Supreme Court's recent decision not to allow certification of the class of all female Wal-Mart employees from a particular time period in an employment discrimination lawsuit against the company.

In June, 2011, the Supreme Court reversed...

Circuit Court of Appeals and blocked a class action sex-discrimination lawsuit against Wal-Mart. The 9th Circuit Court of Appeals had ruled in favor of class certification under FRCP 23(b)(2). The case was filed in 2000 by Betty Dukes, who filed a sex discrimination lawsuit alleging that she was denied the training she needed to advance in the organization and that this discrimination was based on her gender. The plaintiffs alleged that this type of gender-based discrimination was pervasive in the organization and sought to represent 1.6 million women, including all those who work or have previously worked at Wal-Mart since December 26, 1998. The Supreme Court ruled in Wal-Mart's favor, based on the theory that the plaintiffs did not have sufficient things in common to constitute a class. This decision did not mean that women who experienced discrimination could not sue Wal-Mart. However, it did mean that "each member of the class will need to obtain a lawyer to represent her pursue her claim individually against the retailing behemoth" (McKinney, 2011).
One of the more interesting concepts in employment discrimination lawsuits is whether or not class actions are an appropriate way to handle gender discrimination lawsuits. In fact, there is some suggestion that the use of class actions in employment discrimination lawsuits may be seen, by some, as an inappropriate means of contravening the purpose and design of the civil rights lawsuits. "The rules that governed employment discrimination were drafted with an eye to make sure that every case of employee termination or transfer did not become the source of a civil rights action. The goal was to create a regime in which the admitted cases of overt and invidious discrimination could no longer go unpunished" (Epstein, 2003). Of course, employment discrimination lawsuits rapidly expanded beyond the initial scope. "Arguments that certain forms of discrimination were cost-justified (e.g. differential employment because women had higher risk rates than men) were rejected even though these forms of discrimination count as rational (e.g. cost justified) to the economist. At the same time, proof of motive and intention yielded to disparate impact suits, with an enormous expansion…

Sources used in this document:
References

Cummings, S.L. (2011). Privatizing public interest law. UCLA Public Law Series. Retrieved January 25, 2012 from eScholarship website:

http://www.escholarship.org/uc/item/0q7515ht

Epstein, R. (2003). Class actions: Aggregation, amplification, and distortion. University of Chicago Law Review, 70, 475-518.

McKinney, C. (2011, June 20). Supreme Court blocks class action sex discrimination suit.
Retrieved January 25, 2012 from Texas Employment Law Blog website: http://www.texasemploymentlawblog.com/2011/06/articles/sexual-discrimination/supreme-court-blocks-class-action-sex-discrimination-suit/
Stone, K. (2008). The future of labor and employment law in the United States. Institute for Research on Labor and Employment. Retrieved January 25, 2012 from eScholarship website: http://www.escholarship.org/uc/item/6w3620jj?query=class%20action%20employment%20discrimination#page-1
Cite this Document:
Copy Bibliography Citation

Related Documents

Employment Discrimination at Wal-Mart Foundation of the
Words: 5383 Length: 15 Document Type: Essay

Employment Discrimination at Wal-Mart Foundation of the Study This study examines the legislative and judicial climate that enables corporations like Wal-Mart to engage in practices that violate workers' rights. The popular consensus is that Wal-Mart, the largest retail store in the United States, displays an inordinate disregard for the human dignity and morale of its employees and, despite continual litigation, continues to blatantly violate the legal rights of its employees. Wal-Mart faces

Employment Law Policies Employee Policy
Words: 2554 Length: 9 Document Type: Thesis

The employer has an established protocol for dealing with allegations of sexual harassment, and a sexual harassment complaint triggers protections for the employee. An employee engaging in sexual harassment of any other employees, clients, or business associates of the employer, will be disciplined. Any employee engaging in sexual harassment who has been notified by the victim, a supervisor, or any other employee of the employer, that such conduct is

Discrimination in the Workplace: A
Words: 3155 Length: 12 Document Type: Term Paper

Discrimination against the elderly, against pregnant women, against women with children, against people of color are all prohibited under the law. The EEOC or Equal Employment Opportunity Commission was created to administer Title VII of the Civil Rights act and specifically to "progress race, national origin, religious, and sex discrimination claims pursuant to the statue" (Gregory, 2003). Is the EEC doing its job? During the first year alone after

Discrimination in the Fire Service Over Time,
Words: 3332 Length: 10 Document Type: Term Paper

Discrimination in the Fire Service Over time, nearly every profession once considered the exclusive province of men (and in the case of the United States, white men) has gradually been made accessible to minorities, whether through practical necessity, changing cultural standards, or court orders. However, this process has proceeded unevenly, so that even now there remains institutionalized discrimination which serves to preclude women and other minorities from the same opportunities as

Discrimination Case Analysis
Words: 2253 Length: 7 Document Type: Essay

Case Statement This case involved a white woman and a black man who had an encounter in a parking lot and there was controversy if discriminatory action ensued. The two, Hope and Dillon, gave two different versions of the encounter. At its very core, the conflict in the case is about racial discrimination. Legal advocates and scholars have given various definitions to racism and have focused on disparate impact and differential treatment.

Sexual Discrimination in the Work Force
Words: 1117 Length: 4 Document Type: Term Paper

Sex Discrimination in the Workplace Salomon Smith Barney is one of the world's largest financial brokerage groups, with headquarters in New York City and 500 offices serving more than 100 countries around the world. Recent studies indicate that the financial industry as a whole continues many practices that are discriminatory to women, such as unequal pay as well and discriminatory hiring and promotion practices. This paper examines whether a gender gap

Sign Up for Unlimited Study Help

Our semester plans gives you unlimited, unrestricted access to our entire library of resources —writing tools, guides, example essays, tutorials, class notes, and more.

Get Started Now