Achievement Testing
Howell and Rueda in their article Achievement Testing with Culturally and Linguistically Diverse Students question the veracity of the widely used Standardized Norm-Referenced Achievement Test (SNAT) in measuring systematic differences among group means. As they point out, SNAT characteristics, are: completely nonaligned with instruction; assume a uniform curriculum, schooling, language proficiency and sociocultural experience across student groups; and are designed for an outside purpose of formulating education policy. Given the limitations of SNATs, Howell and Rueda explore the alternative Curriculum-Based Measurement (CBM) and the Performance Assessment (PA) approaches to student achievement. Though more aligned to classroom curriculum and instruction, these alternatives too have their limitations. The CBM focus on task-analytic decomposition of complex domains, for example, is of concern for teachers of language minority students who commonly use more holistic or 'whole-language' approaches. Similarly, the reliance of PA on the use of complex and interactive tasks is more likely to interact differentially across different student populations unless systematically controlled. By comparing different assessment approaches to achievement, Howell and Rueda conclude that ultimately the quality of any test is tied to the purpose for which it is used and to that extent, the use of SNATs to obtain an external, global perspective, which facilitates setting of school policy has its relevance in the absence of a better alternative.
A key point that Howell and Rueda make in their assessment of SNATs is the assumption of a uniform curriculum and schooling experience, which is unfair on culturally and linguistically diverse (CLD) students. The validity of this hypothesis is reflected in the 1990s trend of school districts involved in desegregation planning shifting attention to within-school equity and integration in order to improve access to education and academic performance of minority students (Weiler, April 1998).
References
Howell, K.W. & Rueda, R. Achievement Testing with Culturally and Linguistically Diverse
Students. Handbook of Multicultural Assessment. p. 253-284
Weiler, J. (Apr. 1998). Recent Changes in School Desegregation. ERIC/CUE Digest. No. 133
Alberta's Provincial Achievement Testing - Analysis and Critique Achievement tests can generally be considered to be a way for the education system to gain a better understanding of how students accumulate information and of how effective teaching methods are. Also, these respective tests aim to encourage students to get actively involved in the learning process and to demonstrate their abilities. Alberta's educational system acknowledges limitations associated with achievement tests and thus
Tests also are a means by which to ensure that I am doing my job properly as a teacher. Students need to learn and understand certain material, and tests ensure that students will study the material and then prove that they do know the material. Tests are a way to show school administrators and parents what material has been covered and how much of that has been learned by
Achievement and Intelligence Tests Achievement tests measure more specific areas compared to general intelligence tests. They are meant to focus on measuring skill levels within certain specific talent ranges. Often known as standardized tests, achievement tests break down traditional intelligence assessment into very definitive categories. Typically, schools use achievement tests for state standards reporting, and the commonly taken SAT and ACT are standardized tests that represent achievement evaluation, rather than general
The achievement gap also may ultimately negatively affect the U.S. As it may cause the nation to become less competitive in the increasingly global communities (What is the…, 2009). In addition, research indicates that the achievement gap contributes to students who more likely grow up to be unemployed, incarcerated, and poor. Consequently, a quality education proves critical for Black children (Elder, ¶ 3). Causes Contributing to Achievement Gap Causes contributing to
Achievement of African-American students in civilian public schools vs. African-American students in the Depart of Defense (DOD) school system The methods section of this dissertation provides the rationale for the proposed study based on my hypothesis comparing African-American students in the DOD school system with African-American students in civilian school systems. It also highlights the key questions that were examined, how the study was conducted and the measuring criteria for analysis. The
Achievement Gap Among Wealthy and Lower Socioeconomic Communities There exists an achievement gap among wealthy and lower socio economic communities. Students who come from schools within lower socioeconomic communities do not often receive the same education or services from wealthier districts. New Jersey has responded to this inequitable situation with the Abbot funding process. Recently two local communities, Long Branch and Neptune, have been threatened with the loss of their Abbott
Our semester plans gives you unlimited, unrestricted access to our entire library of resources —writing tools, guides, example essays, tutorials, class notes, and more.
Get Started Now