The whipping scene is one of those situations. Whipping was banned in the Army, and Shaw does not seem like the kind of person that would use that punishment, anyway. However, it showed how blacks were treated by their owners at the time, and it helped add drama to the film. It may not have been historically accurate, but it did have a purpose.
The film did portray the training and organization of troops fairly accurately, too, and it portrayed the Battle at Fort Wagner accurately for the most part, too. Shaw did die at the battle, but there are accounts that he died on the top of the Fort, and his body actually fell inside. Many of the 54th were killed that day. Most of the soldiers in the film were runaway slaves, and many slaves did run away to fight in the war, but in reality, most of the soldiers in the 54th were northern black men, some slaves, but most free, and they joined because they believed in the Union cause.
Some of the time periods and people may not have been entirely accurate in this film, but that does not take away from its' importance. It introduced a topic to Americans that most of them did not know or understand, and it portrayed an important time in American history. The film is an important piece of black history, and it is a good portrayal of how blacks were viewed at the time, even if they were free men. It is important to look at the impact of the film as a whole, and not just at the inaccuracies of the film.
In for all blacks in the country.
References
Glory. Dir. Edward Zwick. Perf. Matthew Broderick, Denzel Washington. Tri-Star Pictures, 1989.
Gooding, James Henry. "Massachusetts Black Corporal to the President." University of Maryland. 2009. 16 March 2009. http://www.history.umd.edu/Freedmen/gooding.htm.
Johnson, Hannah. "Mother of a Northern Black Soldier to the President." University of Maryland. 2009. 16 March 2009. http://www.history.umd.edu/Freedmen/hjohnsn.htm.
Russell, Brian. "The 1989 Film 'Glory' and How it Helps Expose an Epic Post-Civil War Myth. Helium.com. 2009. 16 March 2009. http://www.helium.com/items/104438-the-1989-film-glory-and-how-it-helps-expose-an-epic-post-civil-war-myth.
Sterns, George L. "Testimony by the Commissioner for the Organization of Black Troops in Middle and East Tennessee before the American Freedmen's Inquiry Commission." University of Maryland. 2009. 16 March 2009.
And while those parts in the movie were partially fictional, it made honest, historically valid points. In fact Matthew Broderick played the role of Col. Robert Gould Shaw, and this was a true representation of an actual Union Army officer who led the 54th. Another message this movie conveyed was that racism was almost always present in society in the 19th century; that is, white soldiers in many cases were
Were they even higher than the film portrays, or where they Hollywood dramatizing in order to create a film sympathetic to black soldiers in an era of "politically correct" filmmaking? The viewer takes the film for truth, when it may be more fabrication than they know. In conclusion, "Glory" is an interesting film for a number of reasons. It graphically shows the horrors of war, and the additional racial horrors
Film Analysis of the Patriot Colonial America For the purposes of this paper, the film of focus will the Patriot. This film was written by Robert Rodat and directed by Roland Emmerich. The film has quite a cast, including stars the late Heath Ledger, and Mel Gibson, both of which have substantial film careers and reputations both on and off the screen. The film was released in 2000 by Columbia Pictures, a
popular films, The Patriot and Glory to discuss and evaluate leadership illustrations. The writer focuses on the leadership qualities in each film. The writer then explores the differences and similarities between the two especially when it comes to leadership. There were six sources used to complete this paper. Most movie goers will agree that the silver screen productions that they go to view have a theme. The theme may be
Orwellian World The Accuracy of George Orwell's Predictions and What They Hold for Our Future When, in 1949, George Orwell published Nineteen Eighty-Four, the world had just witnessed one of the most trying and tumultuous periods in all of human history. In the space of only thirty-five years, there had been two world wars, a communist revolution, a host of fascist dictators, and a frenzy of slaughter such as had never
The only women appearances in the novel are isolate and the characters are all whores that have no precise role in the story. Indians also make their appearance felt in the story, but none of them has a significant role. Blood Meridian has nothing to do with being a revisionist western, as it does not attempt to present people with a revised picture of old westerns. It is purely anti-western,
Our semester plans gives you unlimited, unrestricted access to our entire library of resources —writing tools, guides, example essays, tutorials, class notes, and more.
Get Started Now