Leverage permits superior possible returns to the investor than otherwise would have been obtainable but the probable for loss is in addition superior, since the investment becomes valueless, the loan principal and all accumulated interest on the loan still need to be paid back (Kotarski, 2009). In monetary economics it has been projected for a long time that financial capital is put into a company each time the probable return of the investment lies beyond the opportunity cost of capital. Opportunity costs point to the worth that would have been produced by another utilization of capital. In the monetary markets opportunity cost of capital matches up to the yield of an investment with a related danger. A corporation generates worth when it utilizes capital more resourcefully than the market. In order to figure out if and how much worth has been produced, the yield of the capital utilized by the corporation is measured up to its cost of capital. A corporation generates an affirmative financial worth if the worth produced by the corporation is superior to the opportunity cost of the capital used, that is, greater than the worth that would have been attained by devoting the identical quantity of capital in the market (Kotarski, 2009).

Corporations must make their cost of capital to produce worth. In the monetary markets this statement is extensively acknowledged. Unfortunately, the monetary markets take into account merely one type of capital when evaluating the cost of capital. Corporations, on the other hand, need a lot of dissimilar forms of capital. Bearing in mind only monetary capital might be satisfactory when only the stakeholder group investments need to be measured. If a wider outlook is taken, such as in the background of sustainable growth, more types of capital must be reflected on. In the monetary markets, an investment is only observed as victorious if it pays back the cost of capital, that is, its opportunity cost (Kotarski, 2009).

If present capital utilized is untenable, reallocating capital from less competent to more competent users founded on the sustainable worth advance can assist to make capital use more sustainable. But sustainable value does not indicate if and when a sustainable utilization of capital has been accomplished. To conquer this weak point, an additional theoretical development to put together worth with burden founded advances is essential. The steady capital regulation is the key to the capital advance to sustainability. Corporations earn their cost of sustainability capital at any time they utilize their set of dissimilar types of capital more proficiently than the standard. Two main insinuations result from this. Regarding the micro level, the advance demonstrates whether the dissimilar types of capital have been allocated to the majority value generating uses and the worth produced consequently. With respect to the macro level, the advance leaves the whole quantity of each type of capital unaffected and steady. Sustainable worth thus conveys the surplus worth produced by a corporation while protecting a steady rank of capital use on the macro level (Kotarski, 2009).

Corporate risk acceptance can be utilized in order to supply direction about significant capital investment choices under doubt. Correctly judging corporate risk acceptance, though, continues to be a demanding characteristic with regard to affecting these financial decision analysis methods. The essential standards of preference analysis involve the beauty of choices should rely on the probability of the probable results of each choice and the inclination of the decision maker for those results. By using preference analysis, decision makers can integrate their company's financial risk tendency into their options amid substitute capital investment selections. Although administrators are appraising projects which are very dissimilar in their amount of risk distinctiveness, the company's force of preference for results and distaste to risk can be constantly applied in the selection progression (Walls, 2005).

The policy concerning capital structure should be outlined keeping in mind the combined consequence of operating leverage and financial leverage both. Considering the combined effect of both leverages, if the degree of both these leverages is very high, business will become more risky. This is because there is a high degree of these leverages entails a greater quantity of fixed costs and a high percentage of funds imposing a fixed burden of monetary charges in the total quantity of funds with the corporation. Conversely, too low a degree of both leverages also is unwanted. For the reason that a low degree of these leverages proposes that the quantity of fixed expenses is too little and the amount of debts in total capital of the corporation is also tremendously low. As the consequence of such a policy, the administration will be deprived of a great number of gainful opportunities...

If operating leverage is elevated and financial leverage is low, it means that the management has approved a very cautious approach in relation with debt capital. But the most favorable circumstance is that in which operating leverage is elevated and financial leverage is low (Combined Effect of Operating Leverage and Financial Leverage, 2009).
From time to time an uncomfortable circumstance arises due to the efforts to raise the rate of return on equity shares keeping in sight the financial leverage only. A lot of corporations in India are sloppily raising the quantity of debt capital. This is risky as the quantity of fixed expenses is big in their business because the amount of both leverages will move up as the result of this strategy. The conclusion is that if financial leverage is to be kept elevated, that is, if funds are to be attained mostly by way of preference shares, debentures and other long-term debts, then the base should be made stronger by keeping working leverage low. While taking monetary decisions, management's chief apprehension normally is earning per share. Therefore the decision on the amount of financial leverage always intends at maximization of earning per share, in order to get the earning per share profit of its equity shares. If monetary leverage is strong-minded keeping in sight earning per share only, it would favor the utilization of debt capital only. When the pace of interest on debentures is lower then the pace of return in business, the earning per share will go on rising with the augment in debts, that is, monetary leverage. Therefore, if the decision is based merely on the contemplation of earning per share, stress will be on debts without any suggestion of the risks it entails. The notion of earning per share is very misleading (Combined Effect of Operating Leverage and Financial Leverage, 2009).

It is misleading because it persuades the administration to put their business in danger by relying too much on the debentures. Earning per share is not an adequate deliberation in deciding the amount of financial leverage. EBIT- EPS analysis is a technique to study the effects of leverage, under a variety of levels of EBIT which engages contrast of substitute methods of financing. EBIT is an unsure factor and its unpredictability has to be taken into account in choosing the degree to which leverage should be utilized. EPS differs with the amount of leverage and with alterations in EBIT. When leverage is utilized, EPS raises more in good years and falls more in bad year. When EBIT goes up, the more leverage that is used and the faster EPS go up. When WBIT is declining, more leverage causes EPS to fall quicker. Likewise, the EPS varies with the substitute financial plans utilized by the company. A company can finance its investments by way of different securities in diverse proportions. It can utilize only equity share capital or can utilize equity and debt capital or can utilize equity and preference capital or equity, preference and debt capital. The company would choose than mixture which gives the largest EPS, at a given level of EBIT (Combined Effect of Operating Leverage and Financial Leverage, 2009).

It appears that all three of these concepts are very important in the financial decision making that companies undergo. Corporations must earn money in order to stay in business and how much risk they are willing to take to do this often drives the instruments that are used to fund projects. As a company's financial leverage increases so does their cost of capital. In the ideal situation a company should have a low operating leverage along with a low financial leverage, which would lead to a low cost of capital.

References

Combined Effect of Operating Leverage and Financial Leverage. (2009). Retrieved January 27,

2011, from Web site: http://www.articlesbase.com/finance-articles/combined-effect-of-operating-leverage-and-financial-leverage-973967.html

Kotarski, K. (2009). Structural Imbalances and Financial Crises Proliferation. Politicka Misao:

Croatian Political Science Review, 46(3), 69-90. Retrieved from EBSCOhost.

Leverage. (2011). Retrieved January 27, 2011, from Web site:

http://www.referenceforbusiness.com/encyclopedia/Kor-Man/Leverage.html

Operating Leverage: A Case Study. (2007). Retrieved January 27, 2011, from Web site:

http://financial-education.com/2007/04/

Schmedt, Fred. (2010). The Concept of Operating Leverage. Retrieved January 27, 2011 from Web site: http://www.noble.org/ag/Economics/OperatingLeverage/index.html

Shim, Jae K. And Siegel, V. (2007). Schaum's Outline of Financial Management, Third Edition.

New York: McGraw Hill.

Troy, Leo. (2008). Almanac of Business and Industrial Financial Ratios. Chicago: CCH.

Walls, M.R. (2005). Measuring and…