Verified Document

9 11 And The Oklahoma City Bombing Effects On Counterterrorism In America Term Paper

Terror and Counterterrorism 9/11 is one instance of international terrorism because its planning and preparation transcended the national boundaries of the United States, and thus its perpetrators could have been prosecuted as international terrorists (Definitions of Terrorism in the U.S. Code, 2015). Indeed, the counterterrorism activities before and after 9/11 indicate that there was a substantial and major shift in efforts to better comprehend and fight international terrorism post-9/11. A form of domestic terrorism, on the other hand, would be the bombing of the Alfred P. Murrah Federal Building in Oklahoma City by Timothy McVeigh and Terry Nichols. The methodology involved in this plot was to use homemade items to construct a bomb that would blow up a federal building.

The Oklahoma City bombing occurred in 1995, six years prior to 9/11. Yet counterterrorism had not sufficiently developed in those intervening years to be able to prevent 9/11. Perhaps the reason for this was that McVeigh and his accomplices were domestic terrorists -- or extremists, who were anti-government and were venting frustrations over the slaughter of the Branch Davidians by the ATF at Waco. Counterterrorism prior to the Oklahoma City bombing was best exemplified by the ATF at Waco, which focused on the Branch Davidian compound as a group of...

The ATF then proceeded to "terrorize" the Davidians into submission by blasting loud music at them day and night with loud speakers and assaulting the compound on various raids that ultimately ended in the compound being burned to the ground (Gazecki, 1997). Counterterrorism prior to the Oklahoma City bombing, which was described as revenge for Waco against the federal government, consisted of monitoring arms sales, as the ATF was doing (Collins, 1997). It encompassed gathering data within certain legal parameters while also upholding individual liberties such as a right to privacy. Prior to and even after the Oklahoma City bombing, one could take an airplane without having to be searched or strip searched. Today, in a post-9/11 world, that is no longer possible, as body scanners are everywhere and everyone is a suspect in the eyes of the various counterterrorism departments of the FBI, TSA, NSA, CIA, etc.
The vulnerabilities that were exploited in Oklahoma City was the sense that no American would be so inhuman as to blow up hundreds of innocent persons out of revenge for something the government did. Yet the bombing showed that America was no longer an innocent place: this act of terror exploited American naivete. Society responded by growing cynical, even doubting the truth of the story…

Sources used in this document:
References

Collins, J. (1997). Oklahoma City: The Weight of Evidence. Time. Retrieved from http://www.webcitation.org/5wow32pJd

Dawson, R. (2013). War by Deception. Retrieved from https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=pK6VLFdWJ4I

Definitions of Terrorism in the U.S. Code. (2015). FBI.gov. Retrieved from https://www.fbi.gov/about-us/investigate/terrorism/terrorism-definition

Gazecki, W. (1997) The Rules of Engagement. Fifth Estate Productions.
Rose, D. (2005). An Inconvenient Patriot. Vanity Fair. Retrieved from http://www.vanityfair.com/news/2005/09/edmonds200509
Cite this Document:
Copy Bibliography Citation

Related Documents

American Terrorism for Many People,
Words: 14357 Length: 50 Document Type: Research Paper

The USA Patriot Act: This was a law that was passed after September 11th. It is giving the police and intelligence officials the power to go after terrorists organizations easier. As it lifted various Constitutional protections when investigating these offenses. Counter Terrorism: These are the activities that: federal, state and local officials are taking to prevent future terrorist attacks. Weapons of Mass Destruction (WMD): These are weapons designed to inflict large amounts

Foreign and Domestic Intelligence the
Words: 6712 Length: 22 Document Type: Term Paper

S. directly. Evidently, the long-term objectives indirectly face the smooth running of the U.S. government. Priority should be given to those aspects that will pull the resources of the country to extreme levels. The U.S. As a super-power is privileged when tackling issues affecting other nations; it is mandated to help developing long-term solutions. Long-term also implies that the impacts and effects need to be widespread in order to maintain balance

Sign Up for Unlimited Study Help

Our semester plans gives you unlimited, unrestricted access to our entire library of resources —writing tools, guides, example essays, tutorials, class notes, and more.

Get Started Now