Use of Stingrays by Law Enforcement
The Use of Stingrays
Stingray technology is a type of cell phone surveillance device used by law enforcement to track suspects. It works by mimicking the signal of a legitimate cell phone tower, causing all phones in the area to connect to it, allowing law enforcement to capture information such as location and call data. Once connected, they can monitor the activity of these phones, such as calls, texts, and location (Pell & Soghoian, 2013). This type of surveillance has been used in numerous criminal investigations, including drug trafficking and terrorism. Thus, stingrays have become increasingly popular with law enforcement due to their high accuracy and low cost.
Stingrays are often used to locate suspects who may be on the run. By tracking the location of a suspect's phone, police can narrow down their search area and make it easier to apprehend them. They can also be used to identify or locate other suspects in a criminal operation. Stingrays can also be used to monitor communications between suspects, enabling police to gather evidence that could be used in a case against them. Finally, Stingrays can be used to disrupt the operations of criminal organizations by blocking their communications (Boyne, 2016).
Technology and Law Enforcement Use Cases and the 4th Amendment
The use of...
…does not violate the rights of citizens under the Fourth Amendment. The courts must continue to provide clarity on the legal issues surrounding the use of Stingray technology, to ensure that law enforcement is operating within the bounds of the US Constitution. The use of stingray technology can have serious legal ramifications; however, the use of stingray technology is not regulated by federal law, meaning that law enforcement agencies may be able to use the devices without obtaining a warrant. This could lead to potential civil rights violations if the devices are used in an unconstitutional manner. It is important for law enforcement agencies to carefully consider the legal implications of using…
References
Boyne, S. M. (2016). Stingray Technology, the Exclusionary Rule, and the Future of
Privacy: A Cautionary Tale. W. Va. L. Rev., 119, 915.
Pell, S. K., & Soghoian, C. (2013). A lot more than a pen register, and less than a
Fourth Amendment Violations 4th Amendment Violations Fourth Amendment Violations and Recourse The Fourth Amendment to the Constitution of the United States provides for "the right of the people to be secure in their persons, houses, papers and effects against unreasonable searches and seizures…," but says nothing about what a court should do if those rights are violated. ("U.S. Constitution: Amendment 4") The Supreme Court of the United States has developed what is known
School Policy Involving Students' 4th Amendment Rights Some of the nation's public schools are beginning to resemble medieval fortresses with armed guards stationed at entrances equipped with metal detectors. Although these steps have helped to prevent the introduction of weapons onto school grounds, more problematic are other types of contraband that inevitably find their way into the nation's schools, including tobacco, alcohol and drugs of all types, as well as
Also, employees should be mindful of what they post on social networking sites, even if done from their home computer. Employers should always be aware of what is considered a reasonable expectation of privacy. In certain industries, workplace monitoring may be necessary so that the company can protect itself. In the case of an organization that deals with the well being of children, even with thorough background checks performed it
Then, the patient can receive free care or referrals to specialists from the doctor. GPs thus can provide comprehensive data regarding patients with a variety of conditions, from a wide range of demographic groups. Currently, 3,500 GP practices, encompassing a population of 23 million patients, contribute to the national QSurveillance database. The system is the largest and most regularly updated health tracking system in the world (National disease surveillance,
This has the advantage of showing the suspect in different profiles. But there have also been accusations that in-person lineups may be biased, if they present the suspect with persons who are not sufficiently 'like' the accused. Also, the use of double-blind presentations, where the officers conducting the lineup do no know who the suspect is, might be advisable to dilute the potential for biased or swayed eyewitness identification.
Our semester plans gives you unlimited, unrestricted access to our entire library of resources —writing tools, guides, example essays, tutorials, class notes, and more.
Get Started Now