GRANT THORNTON (ENGLAND)
Please develop the points for Grant Thornton: also answer the points with new bullets. or separate the paragraph for each point. write many sectors about the company group.

As an indication, Development+ would probably expect you to research and/or be knowledgeable in the following areas:

? the sector in which your selected client/company group operates
? identification of potential issues (ie faced by your selected client group / this may also include those faced by Development+ themselves).
? identification of potential opportunities that Development+ could offer to the client, should they be able to secure new business
? demonstration of your group?s strengths, knowledge etc (ie what would be your ?USP? as a group?)

I will be sending in an essay explaining the small project.

The Grant Proposal Requirements:
Summary/overview of proposal: 4 sentences

Information about the non-profit organization (its mission, history, target population, track record, unique focus, etc.): 4 paragraphs - 1 1/2 to 2 pages

Specific problem/issue/situation to be targeted: 2-3 paragraphs - 1 page

Specific project for which you are seeking funding - describing the project, explaining its importance/uniqueness, identifying target audience, proposing a timeline for the project, and suggesting the specific impact project will have/what you expect to change about the situation as a result of this project: 3-4 paragraphs - 1 1/2 to 2 pages

Identification of results/evaluation of success(specifying the precise impact that the project will have and how that impact will be determined): 2-3 paragraphs - 1 page

Elevator Pitch: will be creating a non profit organization, use imagination
I am XXX from a documentary victims (change name) organization. we work on the after effects of shooting a documentary both on the documentarian and the people targeted in the film because we want to limit the negative exposure people face along with the tragedy that follows when the documentarian does not act on the problem or/and has regrets. our newest goal is to create a weekend seminar where there will be 2 different components, first there will be a workshop in preparing for a documentary, creating an outline and also in editing, and looking at footage; then there will be documentarians talking about the troubles they faced after not acting upon the subject. we will especially target people who deal with the legalities of the issue and try and create a more black and white, concrete way of looking at the issue rather than the gray color it is now.(might also want to add that we will then follow up after a year with a documentary about documentarian using footage captured at the seminar along with other footage captured over a year) We think this project has the potential to help documentarians by showing them how they can capture the shot by not letting themselves or their subject get harmed in the way, by giving them a semi-strick rule book which they would be able to follow instead of the blank canvas they have now. to determine whether our project actually achieves this goal we will??? not sure maybe a document will be formed and we will look at documentaries that come out.. your assistance will be invaluable because we need your help in getting attention for liability issues.

If this topic is too hard please let me know and we could think of a different problem to write a grant proposal for.


There are faxes for this order.

Writing a Grant Proposal

-Research on the topic of "Outcomes of fibrinolytic therapy versus PCI". Identify a research method that could be used to conduct new or further research on the topic of "Outcomes of fibrinolytic therapy versus PCI"

-Develop a grant proposal that will serve to provide funding for the project if the proposal is selected by the donating agency "Blank Enterprise"

-Point font (Times New Roman) and one-inch margins on all sides; pages should be numbered.

The proposal will be a minimum of 4 pages:
Executive Summary (at least 1 page) - Single spaced
Statement of Need (1 page) - Double spaced
Project Description (1 pages) - Double spaced
Conclusion (at least 1 page) - Double spaced

INTRODUCTION
In this section of the grant proposal, you will address the need to evaluate the effectiveness of the program. When a funding source provides money for a program, they want to know that the success of the program will be established and monitored. They also want to know that if something influenced the progress or achievement of outcomes, the organization conducting the program is aware of the situation and is attempting to take measure to correct or modify. Funding sources do not want to give money to a program that does not try to use that money to the best of their ability.
EVALUATION
Funding sources want to see how the organization will evaluate that the goals and objectives of the program have been met. This is a critical section. Funding sources have limited funds. The individuals who decide what grants will be funded want some assurance that the program once funded will in fact be completed and the success of the program will be evaluated.
How this evaluation will be completed will be dependent upon the type of program being implemented and the resources available to the organization requesting the funding. If a patient service is being provided, a patient satisfaction survey may be used to ascertain how the patients felt about the new program. Numbers may be reported as in the numbers of people using the program or a percentage of depicting the success of the program. A copy of the survey used or the form to compile the numbers may be included in the Appendix. Surveys and forms are not usually a part of the actual grant proposal.
The evaluation portion should include the following information:
A plan to evaluate the overall program
A detailed plan to evaluate each objective identified
Describe the method of collecting information
Identify what position will gather and compile the information
Identify how and to whom the information will be reported
Identify a plan to address concerns identified from the evaluation information

There are faxes for this order.

Customer is requesting that (baby99) completes this order.

The fax has been uploaded!

Select Comparison and Contrast rhetorical strategy and write a 900-1050 word essay on the category using Comparison and Contrast. Meaning you should show compare and contrast in the Catton piece. Be sure to follow one of the organizational patterns for that rhetorical strategy.

Please make sure your paper is formatted along APA guidelines.
You will need a reference page as well as two in-text citations
Comparison and Contrast
Grant and Lee: A Study in Contrasts by Bruce Catton

NOTE: It is required to have two drafts--a rough and a final. I will resubmit (send you by email) the draft that you send to me with comments that you can use to redo/edit the essay.

Also, the story is "Grant and Lee: A study in contrasts" page 631. I'm just clarifying if there's any confusion.

Thanks

There are faxes for this order.

Please choose a public policy that president Grant and Wilson proposed to Congress and examine how the two branches of government interacted on this policy. What happened, how did it get there, why did it get proposed, and what was to ultimate outcome. What role did Grant and Wilson play in getting this policy passed. (See attached papers for public policies they did). APA style
There are faxes for this order.

Customer is requesting that (researchpro) completes this order.

Write a Six paragraph essay on Bruce Catton's Grant and Lee: " A Study in Contrasts."
Essay Needs to Be In MLA Style

Compose a response to the following questions at the end of the Comparison story, Bruce Catton, Grant and Lee: A study in Contracts...

Bruce Catton (1899-1978) was a Civil War specialist whose early career included reporting for various newspapers. In 1954 he received both the Pulitzer Prize for historical work and the National Book Award. He served as director of information for the United States Department of Commerce and wrote many books, including Mr. Lincoln?s Army (1951), Glory Road (1952), A Stillness at Appomattox (1953), The Hallowed Ground (1956), America Goes to War (1958), The Coming Fury (1961), Terrible Swift Sword (1963), Never Call Retreat (1966), Waiting for the Morning Train: An American Boyhood (1972), and Gettysburg: The Final Fury (1974). For five years, Catton edited American Heritage.

"GRANT AND LEE: A STUDY IN CONTRASTS"
by Bruce Catton
?Grant and Lee: A Study in Contrast? was written as a chapter of The American Story, a collection of essays by noted historians. In this study, as in most of his other writing, Bruce Catton does more than recount the facts of history: he shows the significance within them. It is a carefully constructed essay, using contrast and comparison as the entire framework for his explanation.

When Ulysses S. Grant and Robert E. Lee met in the parlor of a modest house at Appomattox Court House, Virginia, on April 9, 1865, to work out the terms for the surrender of Lee?s Army of Northern Virginia, a great chapter on American life came to a close, and a great new chapter began.
These men were bringing the Civil War to its virtual finish. To be sure, other armies had yet to surrender, and for a few days the fugitive Confederate government would struggle desperately and vainly, trying to find some way to go on living now that its chief support was gone. But in effect it was all over when Grant and Lee signed the papers. And the little room where they wrote out the terns was the scene of on of the poignant, dramatic contrasts in American History.
They were two strong men these oddly different generals, and they represented the strengths of two conflicting currents that through them, had come into final collision.
Back of Robert E Lee was the notion that the old aristocratic concept might somehow survive and be dominant in American life.
Lee was tidewater Virginia, and in his background were family, culture, and tradition? the age of chivalry transplanted to a New World which was making its own legends and its own myths. He embodied a way of life that had come down through the age of knighthood and the English country squire. America was a land that was beginning all over again, dedicated to nothing much more complicated than the rather hazy belief that all men had equal rights and should have and equal chance in the world. In such a land Lee stood for the feeliong that it was somehow of advantage to humans society to have a pronounced inequality in the social structure. There should be a leisure class, backed by ownership of land; in turn, society itself should be keyed to the land as the chief source of wealth and influence. It would bring fourth (according to this ideal) a class of men with a strong sense of obligation to the community; men who lived not to gain advantage for themselves, but to meet the solemn obligations which had been laid on then by the very fact that they were privileged. From them the country would get its leadership? to them it could look for higher values ? of thought, of conduct, or personal deportment ? to give it strength and virtue.
Lee embodied the noblest elements of this aristocratic ideal. Through him, the landed nobility justified itself. For four years, the Southern started had fought a desperate war to uphold the ideals for which Lee stood. In the end, it almost seemed as of the Confederacy fought for Lee; as if he himself was the Confederacy? the best thing that the way of life for which the Confederacy stood could ever have to offer. He had passed into legend before Appomattox. Thousands of tired, underfed, poorly clothed Confederate soldiers, long since past the simple enthusiasm of the early days of the struggle, somehow considered Lee the symbol of everything for which they had been willing to die. But they could not quite put this feeling into words, If the Lost Cause, sanctified by so much heroism and so many deaths, had a living justification, its justification was General Lee.
Grant, the son of a tanner on the Western frontier, was everything Lee was not. He had come up the hard way and embodied nothing in particular except the eternal toughness and sinewy fiber of the men who grew up beyond the mountains. He was one of a body of men who owed reverence and obeisance to no one, who were self-reliant to a fault, who cared hardly anything for the past but who had a sharp eye for the future.
These frontier men were the precise opposites of the tidewater aristocrats. Back of them, in the great surge that had taken people over the Alleghenies and into the opening Western country, there was a deep, implicit dissatisfaction with a past that had settled into grooves. They stood for democracy, not from any reasoned conclusion about the proper ordering of human society, but simply because they had grown up in the middle of democracy and knew how it worked. Their society might have privileges, but thy would be privileges each man had won for himself. Forms and patterns meant nothing. No man was born to anything, except perhaps to a chance to show how far he could rise. Life was competition.
Yet along with this feeling had come a deep sense of belonging to a national community. The Westerner who developed a farm, opened a shop, or set up in business as a trader could hope to prosper only as his own community prospered ? and his community ran from the Atlantic to the Pacific and from Canada down to Mexico. If the land was settled, with towns and highways and accessible markets, he could better himself. He saw his fate in terms of the nation?s own destiny. As its horizons expanded, so did his. He had, in other words, and acute dollars-and-cents stake in the continued growth and development of his country.
And that, perhaps, is where the contrast between Grant and Lee becomes most striking. The Virginia aristocrat, inevitably, saw himself in relation to his own region, He lived in a static society which could endure almost anything except change. Instinctively, his first loyalty would go to the locality in which that society existed. He would fight to the limit of endurance to defend it, because on defending it he was defending everything that gave his own life its deepest meaning.
The Westerner, on the other hand, would fight with an equal tenacity for the boarder concept of society. He fought so because everything he lived by was tied to growth, expansion, and a constantly widening horizon. What he lived by would survive of fall with the nation itself. He could not possibly stand by unmoved on the face of an attempt to destroy the Union. He would combat it with everything he had, because he could only see it as an effort to cut the ground out from under his feet.
So Grant and Lee were in complete contrast, representing two diametrically opposed elements in American life. Grant was the modern man emerging; beyond him, ready to come on the stage was the great age of steal and machinery, of crowded cities and a restless burgeoning vitality. Lee might have ridden down from the old age of chivalry, lance in hand, silken banner fluttering over his head. Each man was the perfect champion for his cause, drawing both his strengths and his weaknesses from the people he led.
Yet it was not all contrast, after all. Different as they were ? in background, in personality, in underlying aspiration ? these two great soldiers had much in common. Under everything else, they were marvelous fighters. Furthermore, their fighting qualities were really very much alike.
Each man had, to begin with, the great virtue or utter tenacity and fidelity. Grant fought his way down the Mississippi Valley in spite of acute personal discouragement and profound military handicaps. Lee hung on in the trench at Petersburg after hope born fighter?s refusal to give up a long as he can still remain on his feet and lift his two fists.
Daring and resourcefulness they had, too: the ability to think faster and move faster than the enemy. These were the qualities which gave Lee the dazzling campaigns of Second Manassas and Chancellorsville and won Vicksburg for Grant.
Lastly, and perhaps greatest of all, there was the ability, at the end, to turn quickly from the war to peace once the fighting was over. Out of the way these two men behaved at Appomattox came the possibility of peace of reconciliation. It was a possibility not wholly realized, in the year to come, but which did, in the end, help the two sections to become one nation again? after a war whose bitterness might have seemed to make such a reunion wholly impossible. No part of either man?s life became him more than the part he played in their brief meeting in the McLean house at Appomattox. Their behavior there all succeeding generations of Americans in their debt. Two great Americans, Grant and Lee ? very different, yet under everything very much alike. Their encounter at Appomattox was one of the great moments of American history.

Cited info Stragies for Successful Writing:A Rhetoric, Research Guide, Reader and Handbook, 6th Edition by James A. Reinking, Andrew W. Hart, and Robert von der Osten


*** QUESTIONS 3-4
3. Why do the differences between Grant and Lee recieve more extended treatment than the similarities? Why are the similarities discussed last?
4. How would you characterize Catton's attitude towards the two men? Refer to specific parts of the essay when answering.

Appalachian Trail Conservancy Grant proposal

FUNDING PERIOD: JULY 1, 2013 THROUGH JUNE 30, 2014

NOTE: use a real organization as a case study for the grant application.


*Eligible projects include land acquisition and construction for future recreation development; expansion and renovation of major outdoor and/or indoor recreation facilities; provision of leisure-related programs and services - including personnel, equipment, supplies and administrative support (mailings, duplication, telephones, office space and furniture, etc.) necessary for implementation.

*30%-70% matching program. Applicant must show ability to provide 30% of total funding for proposed project. In-kind services are allowed. Funding is for one fiscal year, but renewal application is available based on evaluation of previous years performance.
*Maximum funding: $300,000
*Minimum funding: $100,000
*Eligible Project Total Range: $428,571 - $142,857
In order to be considered for awards, each proposal MUST have at least the following components:

I. EXECUTIVE SUMMARY
*Summary of main points of each part of the proposal, not a cut and paste of what has been written in document sections
*Written after the proposal is complete
*No more than 500 words

II. INTRODUCTION
*Brief history of organization
*Mission and objectives
*Overview of clientele served or sought to be served
*Highlights of organization achievement (in proposed areas or related)

III. STATEMENT OF PROBLEM
*Define problem to be solved by the proposed project
*Provide evidence to substantiate importance of problem
*Show uniqueness of proposed effort to solve problem

IV. OBJECTIVES
*Provide at least three expected outcomes of the implementation of the proposed project
*Write objectives that are specific, measurable, attainable, relevant, and trackable

V. METHODS AND PROCEDURES
*Describe program activities expected to be delivered
*Describe how staffing of program will be allocated (positions and expertise)
*Describe expected participants (socio-demographic info) and how they will be selected
*Describe scope of activities expected within proposed time frame and utilization of resources if proposed project is awarded

VI. EVALUATION PLAN AND CRITERIA
*Define criteria by which success of proposed project will be judged
*Describe data gathering methods and analysis
*Identify source and credentials of evaluators
*Explain any instruments to be used
*Provide indication of use of evaluation results

VII. BUDGET PLAN
*Provide itemized proposed budget plan (format choice, optional)
*Identify proportion of proposed expenditures to be derived from agency and that expected to be derived from grant source (30/70 split)
*Identify any items that will be funded in-kind and by whom
*Provide a budget narrative that explains process and items in budget plan
*Provide plan for continued funding for project after first year of implementation

VIII. SUPPORTIVE DOCUMENTATION
*Provide all attachments that will provide necessary clarity of points made within the proposal
*Should be identified in the appendices and in table of contents

IX. REFERENCES
*Use of APA style for citations and references is expected
*Provide credit for information received from others

Customer is requesting that (researchpro) completes this order.

Submit a topic proposal--
The topic proposal should provide the following information: (1) which two presidents will be the focus of your papers? (2) Why did you choose these particular presidents? (3) What public policy or policies will you focus on for each president and (4) how do you plan to do research for this project?

The two presidents are: Ulysses S. Grant and Woodrow Wilson

This is a GRANT PROPOSAL TERM PAPER on Public Health issues. I do not have a specific topic, but I am looking at something related to minority health or health disparity. I will be sending you a word document consists of the components of the proposal. I will also include a list of some grant supporters, I hope that would be helpful.
The organization that I will be representing is Saint Anselm's Cross Cultural Community Center (please refer to the word document for the website). You will need this for the organziation information part of the proposal.
There are faxes for this order.

I need 1 page of a cover letter to the grant proposal and 1 page of an abstract to the grant proposal. I will be sending an example of what the cover letter to the grant proposal should look like. please follow the exact format for both cover letter and abstract. Will also attach the grant proposal.

COVER LETTER:
No more than 1 page
Briefly summarize what you are proposing for reviewers
State the title, and why your project is an innovative one
this study will provide crucial data in the field of
Create a header for yourself and your organization
Name, address, e-mail phone number, etc
Always sign at the bottom

ABSTRACT:
300 words in a single paragraph
What to include (need all 4 parts):
Background of the health issue
What you are planning to do
How you will measure change
What you plan to do with the results
There are faxes for this order.

Customer is requesting that (FreelanceWriter) completes this order.

Please written a fictional Methods, Strategies, Program Design for a Grant proposal 3 pages long.
The Proposal should be base on the mainly Middlesex County in NJ but it will cater to the other area in NJ and from the state of NJ, NY , PA, CT .

Please use the following information list below to construct the Methods, Strategies, Program Design for the Grant.

Name of Organization: Euel A. Corbin Foundation aka Mind the Cure

Organization Project Name: Living with Brain Cancer Resource Program

Cause: Meeting the needs of individuals and family members who have been affected by cancerous brain tumors through support resources and finance.

*****Project information description for writing the grant****
This project brings brain cancer patients and their families together with help to bridge their isolation. The Living with Brain Cancer Resource program offers patients, families and caregivers a variety of support groups, educational workshops and programs designed to teach people how to cope with the effects of brain cancer. The project will produce an internet-based hub of information, with pathways to further support services including, written material and support groups. These services will be available to everyone regardless of their location.

Some more Support Services include:
? Online Resource Directory
? Brain injury resources, books and brochures
? Online Family help line
? Local Support Group
? Financial Support Service case base only

MISSION: The mission is to find a cure for brain cancer by advancing scientific research, by promoting the detection, diagnosis, treatment, educating and prevention efforts of the community healthcare systems by engaging in the acquisition of knowledge through clinical research and support patients and families afflicted with this devastating disease.

VISION: The vision is to enable research and support programs that will have the highest impact one advancing the mission of the organization.

I have also Attached the Need statement (Problem Statement) if it will help.

Dear EssayTown writer,
please help me to write a community health nutrition-oriented project/program Grant Proposal. These is a theoretical program that I designed. I will sent outlines by fax.


Thank you for your help and time.
There are faxes for this order.

This paper analyzes a significant public policy mainly Federal grants?in?aid programs from a series of perspectives, including, but not limited to the following: 1) administrative, 2) efficiency, 3) social equity or justice, 4) legal & political; and 5) economic.
Policy analysis originates in politics, channeling political conflict while building community and
also points out that policy analysis serves opposing sides. While cases and public policies may differ, but
the following questions helps to structure the paper.

1. What is the policy problem? Federal grants?in?aid programs, the problem is lack of accountability and misuse of funds. Also who really benefits from these programs.
Define it specifically and present your problem statement. Make sure you are clear as to the policy goals.
2. What are the value conflicts?
3. What is the context of the administrative, legal and political policy?
4. What are the relevant facts? Describe what happened and the influential actors and their institutional contexts. Who supports the policy and who does not? Why or why not?
5. What public administration theories and analytical approaches are relevant for understanding and evaluating this policy problem?
6. Analysis: What are the central issues raised by the policy case?
7. Analysis: What are the major factors in the development
of the policy, the implementation of the policy, or the evaluation of the policy?
8. What are the costs/benefits of the policy and which groups are affected?
9. What alternatives are appropriate for addressing this policy problem? Why are these approaches appropriate?
10. What recommendations emerge from this analysis? Justify them.
11. What are the conclusion and the political implications

1

u01d2 Sources of Funding

The success of a grant proposal can be doomed from the start if the potential funder is a poor match for the grant project. Search the Internet using the resources provided in the handout, Sources of Funding. Locate three potential funders for a nonprofit human service organization of your choice, preferably one with which you are familiar.
Name the funders and Web sites, including the URLs, and describe your criteria for selecting them as prospects. Provide any additional information that would indicate their suitability to receive a grant proposal. For example, if your nonprofit organization serves homeless people, you will select potential funders who award grants:
For that particular population.
For your organization's particular services to that population.
For the dollar amount you would be seeking.
Based on other specifics that would constitute a good match for your organization.
You are welcome and encouraged to use the research you are doing for the Letter of Inquiry assignment in this discussion.
Response Guidelines
In your response to at least two other learners, provide constructive comments on their choice of potential funders and their criteria for selecting them.
Resources
Discussion Participation Scoring Guide.
Sources for Sample Grant Proposals
Sources of Funding

2

u01d3 Information Gathering
Once potential funders have been identified, you need to communicate with them. A common way to communicate with the funding organization is to clarify further what they are looking for in the projects they consider funding. This can be done by either calling, writing, or meeting with the concerned person. It is important to read the funders' submission guidelines to ensure that they are open to contacts. Some prefer that prospective grantees complete forms or other preliminary materials before contacting them.

Select one of the three funders you identified in the previous discussion, Sources of Funding. Imagine that you are send an email to a representative of that organization. Briefly describe your nonprofit organization and mention that it is considering sending a proposal to this funder. Then in your email, ask any questions you would have for the funder.
Response Guidelines
Respond to the posts of at least two learners. Comment on whether you think their questions would be effective for gathering the necessary information and provide reasons for the same. What other questions might they consider asking?

Victims Program Grant Application

For this Final Project you will complete select portions (See Sections III A, B and C1 and C2 below) of a grant application for a program to assist victims of violent crime. The program you select must be drawn from those listed in Section II below. You must include a minimum of 4 outside sources (in addition to your text book) in support of your Project Narrative. The submission must be a minimum of 10 pages, not including the Cover page and the References page(s).

Format

Program title
Class title and number
Date of submission
A minimum of ten (10) narrative pages
12 font, double spaces, 1 inch margins
APA formatted citations for quoted materials in the narrative
References Page(s)
Citations for all quoted (non-original) materials in APA format
Minimum 4 outside sources
The course materials must be cited if referenced
VICTIMS Program Grant Application

I. BACKGROUND

The Fund provides advocacy and support services to victims of crime for the purpose of developing and enhancing existing programs that serve victims of crime. The State Board will also accept applications that provide new services or additional assistance for crime victims and witnesses, or for services that directly support a specific population of crime victims.

The following priorities have been identified by the State Board of Victim Services, though other initiatives are also permitted:

Direct Services for Victims of Crime;
Victim Advocates in Law Enforcement;
Victim Advocates in State's Attorney's Offices;
Enhanced services and support for Child Advocacy Centers; and
Enhanced services to crime victims that aid and promote the distribution of mandated brochures and educate them on their rights according to state law.
II. PROGRAM PURPOSE AREAS

Grants supported by the Victims of Crime (VOC) Fund support at least one of the following purpose areas:

Coordinating services for crime victims from first response through the criminal justice system and beyond which include those individuals in law enforcement, prosecutors' offices, courts, victim service agencies, other state agencies, and non-governmental organizations serving crime victims;
Developing, enlarging, or strengthening all victim service programs including private non-profit organizations, police victim/witness sections, and District/Circuit court victim/witness units;
Developing or improving the delivery of crime victim services to underserved populations;
Providing support to specialized domestic violence advocates in courts where a significant number of protection orders are granted;
Developing, expanding, or strengthening crime victim programs addressing Non-English speaking citizens; and
Implementing community-driven initiatives to address the needs of crime victims who are included in the underserved populations: people with disabilities, elder victims of crime, and children of physical and sexual abuse.
III. What an application must include

A. Project Title

B. Project Summary

The Project Summary is a brief (maximum 250 words, or approximately 1 page) that describes:
The problem/issue your grant funded program intends to address (must align with one of the Program Purpose Areas listed in Section II) ;
The program itself, what it is and how it will operate
How the program will specifically and directly address the problem/issue you identified
C. Program Narrative

Statement of the Problem
The history of victimization problem/issue you identified
The scope of the problem
Failure(s) to address the problem adequately
The potential to have a significant impact on the problem with the right program
Project Overview, Goals and Objectives
Description of Project; a detailed narrative of the program organization administration and operation.
Goals; a detailed narrative of what the program hopes to accomplish
Objectives; a detailed description of the indicators of positive progress, (How will you know the program is effective)
Methods of Reaching Objectives
A detailed description of the various steps or activities that will be used to achieve the objectives for this project
How the program work will be organized, administered and operated
The manner in which responsibility within the project will be assigned
Collaborations you intend to develop to further the efforts of the project and the role of each such collaborating entity.
If the project is adopting procedures used by another program, describe the strengths and weaknesses of the other program and how this project will differ in its approach to the problem and/or how it will improve upon it.



Grading Rubric for Final Project




Element Evaluated
Evaluation Criteria
Score
Overall content of paper, analysis, presentation, or project
(50%) of total grade available for this paper/project
Excellent: Content of the paper addresses all information required by assignment, demonstrates critical thinking skills, sophisticated analysis and other perspectives. (33-50%)
Superior: Content of the paper addresses most or all information required by assignments and demonstrates critical thinking skills, critical analysis and other perspectives. (17-32%)
Satisfactory: Content of the paper addresses a majority of the information required by the assignment and demonstrates some critical thinking skills, critical analysis and other perspectives (1-16%)
Unsatisfactory: Content of the paper address a minimal amount of the information required by the assignment and demonstration of critical thinking skills, critical analysis and other perspectives is lacking (0%)

Responsiveness to Project Description
e.g.; application of theory and knowledge to given facts
Terminology,
Organization, etc.
(30%)
Excellent: Application of theory and knowledge is very evident. Use of topic-specific terminology is correct in all instances. Organization is relevant to topic, clear and understandable with logical flow. (21-30%)
Superior: Comprehensive understanding of theory and knowledge is shown. Use of topic-specific terminology has only minor errors. Minor mistakes in organization and style. (11-20%)
Satisfactory: Some understanding of theory and knowledge is shown. Topic-specific terminology is mostly correct. Organization is mostly relevant, clear, and logical (1-10%)
Unsatisfactory: Understanding of theory and knowledge is lacking in significant respects. Multiple mistakes in topic-specific terminology. Lacks relevance, is unclear, difficult to understand, or logic is missing. (0%)

Formatting, references, and APA citations
(10%)
Excellent: Assignment is formatted exactly as required, all required citations and references are present and APA standards are followed in every respect (9-10%)
Superior: Assignment is formatted as required with minor/inconsequential deviations, resource requirements are met, citations and references are present and APA standards are followed (6-8%)
Satisfactory: Assignment mostly formatted as required but missing some required elements/sources or some APA errors are evident (1-5%)
Unsatisfactory: Assignment is missing major elements, lacks required sources or APA is not followed however a different citation method is used correctly (0%)

Grammar / Mechanics
(10%)
Excellent: No or minor English and grammar usage errors (9-10%)
Superior: A few minor/inconsequential mistakes in English and grammar (6-8%)
Satisfactory: Some obvious mistakes evident in English and grammar usage (1-5%)
Unsatisfactory: Many mistakes evident in English/grammar usage (0%)

PLEASE READ EVERY INSTRUCTION CAREFULLY- VERY TEDIOUS THOROUGH ASSIGNMENT-

ALSO PART 1&2 ARE COMPLETED FOR THIS ASSIGNMENT SO I WILL SEND THE PAPERS AND EXAMPLES OF WHAT NEEDS TO BE COMPLETED ON MY PART.


The grant proposal in on Strengthening the Family unit and the agency we chose in called: Relationship Skills Center- you will need to go on the website, which is, skillscenter.org

All resources will be in the resources I upload


The resources I will be sending. This is the final and last part of a 3 part assignment for a social work policy class.

I am working with a partner and we are having to do a grant proposal for Strengthening The Family Unit. This assignment will provide the experience of editing a full grant proposal and relevant attachments and graphics, using boiler plate information from prior documents. YOU WILL ONLY NEED TO COMPLETE THE SECTION HIGHLIGHTED IN YELLOW IN THE 665 ASSIGNMENT 3 DIRECTION GUIDELINE-

THE SECTION OF ASSIGNMENT 3 YOU WILL BE COMPLETING IS THE BUDGET NARRATIVE AND LINE ITEM BUDGET. please read thorough. during the budget narrative in-text citation is a must on every single paragraph. please read the two previous assignments to understand what to look for



There are faxes for this order.

School Grants and Proposal Opportunities
Objective(s):

After successful completion of Module 2, students will have a greater understanding of:
? State, Federal and private grants available to school districts
? Grant writing process and submitting a proposal

Readings
? Read article 2.1 School grants and proposals.
? The web sites below have been identified as current and prevalent in today?s world of Grants for Career and Technical education.

? Review the web sites below, paying close attention to
o Eligibility requirements
o Funding requirements
o Dates the applications are available
o Due dates
o Award dates
o Information required
? Select a grant from the list below or one of your own choosing.
o Review it toughly
o Summarize the grant in a written paper

State and Federal Grant examples
? California Partnership Academies SB70 Planning Grant
o http://www.cde.ca.gov/fg/fo/profile.asp?id=1965

? Carl D. Perkins Career and Technical Education Improvement Act of 2006 (P.L. 109-270)
o http://www.cde.ca.gov/ci/ct/pk/

? Public Charter Schools Grant Program Planning and Implementation Grant
o http://www.cde.ca.gov/fg/fo/r1/pcsgp12rfa.asp

? EPA United States Environmental Protection Agency
o http://www.epa.gov/education/grants/index.html

? California Partnership Academies Green Academy Planning Grants
o http://www.cde.ca.gov/fg/fo/r17/cpagreen09rfa.asp

? Government grants
o http://www.grants.gov/applicants/find_grant_opportunities.jsp

Local and Regional Grant examples
? LOWES TOOL KIT for Classrooms
o http://www.toolboxforeducation.com/
? The National Educators Association Foundation
o http://www.neafoundation.org/pages/educators/
? Grants Alert
o http://www.grantsalert.com/gr

This paper is to be written in the form of a grant proposal. Use the attached request for grant proposal (Senior In-Home Services program) to develope an innovative program plan for addressing the issue and prepare a proposal to secure funding for the proposed program. The proposal should follow these guidelines:

The Body Of The Proposal
a) A proposal for a program designed to address "Senior In-Home Services Program" In this section, describe in deatail, the method you are proposing to address the issue identified. The program may target individuals, families, groups, organizations, communities or a combination of all levels.

b) Also in this section include program goals and objectives , outcomes, program structure, target population and direct services to be provided.Whatever is required in the attached RFP should be included and case examples of the consumers who will participate in the proposed program.

c) The budget: This section should include a description of the administrative structure, staffing needs, and a proposed budget.
There are faxes for this order.

There will be 5 specific part to this grant proposal. Please follow format.
Background
Specific aims
Methods/design/:
Will include potential sample size
Statistical methods to analyze results
Human subjects/recruitment/compensation
Public health significance

Must have all 5 parts in the grant proposal.

Background
The most important section prior to planning the study
Do not repeat what has already been done in same context
Setting
Location, culture, income
The agent under study
Infection, disease, health issue
What has been done so far in the field
Studies that led up to this point
What you hope to do and why it is innovative
how is what you propose different

Specific aims
What you hope to accomplish
Usually 2-4 aims per study
Make sure they are reachable goals
One sentence each
More details later with methods used to accomplish each
Ex: To identify risk factors associated with external genital warts (penile, anal, and both) among Peruvian MSM.

Methods/Design/Limitations
How you will do the study
Interviews, data collection, literature review, analysis
Study population
Specifically whom (men, women, age, etc), location, and N
Outcome measures
How you will measure the effect of the intervention
Clinical tests, return/completed visits, cases of disease, etc
Potential limitations
Small sample size
Cant offer nothing when something works
study design
Various options here depending on what you want to achieve
What are some study design types you have learned?
sample size
The N needed to achieve your aims
Give a brief and educated guess
recruitment and retention
Sampling
Simple random, convenience, snowball
Strategies and methods to enroll and keep participants
data analysis
Data entry methods
Collect with paper or with technology like PDA
Data analysis method

Human subjects
IRB applications
Usually ALWAYS required
Ensuring protection of participants
Understanding of procedures
Data confidentiality
Choice to participate or end early
Types of consent
Oral, written, community
How to deal with secondary illnesses discovered
If you look for it you need to treat it

Public Health significance
How the project will change the world
If things work out how you expect
How others can work with the knowledge gained
Policy considerations
Whats next?


The topic for the grant proposal is for a local non profit organization named ST. Anselm's to offer a physical activity classes for their seniors everyday. monday - friday. instead of just mon, wed, and fri morning tai-chi class for one hour. It will benefit the seniors. This study will go on for 1 year.
Customer is requesting that (FreelanceWriter) completes this order.

*****THE WRITER NEEDS TO BE FAMILIAR ON HOW TO WRITE A GRANT /PROGRAM PROPOSAL
THIS IS A PROGRAM /GRANT PROPOSAL.
WHAT NEEDS TO BE DONE IS :

7 PAGES OF THE NEXT 4 TOPICS, IT NEEDS TO BE MASTERS LEVEL, IF YOU NEED TO CITE GO AHEAD BUT IT IS NO A REQUIREMENT BECAUSE THIS IS A PROGRAM/GRANT PROPOSAL THAT I AM DOINGlike for example statistics ,THIS IS NOT A RESEARCH PAPER, PLEASE DO NOT CONFUSE THIS PAPER , THIS PAPER IS A GRANT PROPOSAL ONLY. .I WILL BE FAXING A LOT OF STUFF, HOW TO WRITE A GRANT , WHAT NEEDS TO BE INCLUDED IN THE 4 OBJECTIVES.ONE IS FROM THE GRANTSMANSHIP CENTER ON HOW TO WRITE AND WHAT TO INCLUDE IN THE PROGRAM PLANNING AND PROPOSAL WRITING, I HAVE A LOT OF IT DONE FROM IV. METHODS TO VII. BUDGET, I AM FAXING THIS TO GIVE YOU IDEAS OF WHAT I AM REQUESTING TO HELP IN THE WRITING OF THE NEXT FOUR ITEMS I AM LACKING..
****PLEASE WRITE IN SINGLE SPACED FORMAT, NOT DOUBLE SPACED AS THIS IS A PROPOSAL THAT IS DONE SINGLE SPACED
SUMMARY2 PAGES WRITTEN
I. INTRODUCTION-1 PAGES WRITTEN
II. PROBLEM STATEMENT OR NEEDS ASSESSMENT-2 PAGES WRITTEN
III. OBJECTIVES-1 PAGES
12 POINT FONT-NEW TIMES ROMAN, IF NEED BE USE APA BUT MORE THAN LIKELY YOU WONT NEED TO UNLESS YOU FIND OR USE STATISTICS.
. SUMMARYPLEASE MAKE SURE ALL 10 ITEMS ARE DONE
I. INTRODUCTION,THERE ARE 12 THINGS THAT NEED TO BE CHECKED , I WILL BE SENDING THE FAX OF THE PROPOSALA CHECKLIST AND EVALUATION FORMTHIS IS A MUST IN ORDER TO WRITE THE PAPER.
II. PROBLEM STATEMENT OR NEEDS ASSESSMENT
III. PROGRAM OBJECTIVES.ON THIS ONE THE POPULATION THAT WILL BENEFIT ARE LATINOS RESIDING IN THE LOWER RIO GRANDE VALLEY IN TEXAS. IT WILL ENHANCE THE LEARNING AND THEIR GLOBAL AWARENESS .
***********THESE ARE THE ONLY ONE THAT NEED TO BE DONE ******WHEN WRITING THE PROPAL PLEASE START OFF WITH TITILE AND THE NUMERICAL NUMBERS FOR EXAMPLE:
SUMMARY2 PAGES WRITTEN
IV. INTRODUCTION-1 PAGES WRITTEN
V. PROBLEM STATEMENT OR NEEDS ASSESSMENT-2 PAGES WRITTEN
VI. OBJECTIVES-1 PAGES
I AM FAXING THE OTHER PART THAT HAS ALREADY BEEN DONE ON THIS PROPOSAL WHICH IS THE COVER LETTER , PLEASE READ IT ALL AND IT SHOULD GIVE YOU AN IDEA OF WHAT WE ARE PROPOSINGI AM SENDING THE COVER LETTER THE APPLICATION I MADE UP FOR THIS PROGRAM , I AM SENDING THE BUDGET AND THE METHODS AND EVALUATION, IF YOU HAVE ANY QUESTIONS LET ME KNOW..
***IF YOU NEED TO YOU CAN USE WEBISTES THAT MIGHT HAVE THIS PROGRAM IN PLACE TO ASSIST , ALSO YOU CAN USE THIS WEBSITE TO GIVE YOU AN IDEA OF THE POPULATION OF THIS AREA.www.utpa.edu or the are of the Lower Rio Grande Valley in Texas.
*AN OVERVIEW OF THIS PROPOSAL IS INTERNATIONAL TRAVEL, THE NAME TO MY PROJECT/PROGRAM/AGENCY IS INTERNATIONAL DEVELOPMENT FOR SOCIAL AWARENESS, AND MY INTENT IS LIKE THE INTERNATIONAL DEPARTMENTS IN THE UNIVERSITIES, HWOEVER MY PROGRAM CAN BE STUDENTS, FACULTY/STAFF/OR ANYBODY ELSE WHO WANTS TO TRAVEL AND GAIN AWARENESS IN GLOBAL AWARENESS AND TO ENHANCE THE MAXIMS(FOR EXAMPLE, WHEN I SAY MAXIMS I MEAN LEADERSHIP SKILLS, AWARENESS, MANAGEMENT SKILLS, ETC) OF THE INDIVIDUALS AND TO HELP THOSE COUNTRIES IN NEED. MY INTENT IS FOR THE FUNDING TO HELP FOR THE 10 PARTICIPANTS CHOSEN TO GO ON THIS TRAVEL TO HAVE ALL OR PARTIAL OF THE TRIP PAID AND FOR EQUIPMENT AND SO FORTH IF YO UREAD THE PAPERS I AM FAXING OF THE PARTIAL PROPOSAL IT WILL GIVE YOU MORE INSIGHT..


MY EMAIL ADDRESS IS [email protected]
There are faxes for this order.

I need to write a grant for a third grade classroom for an "Elmo" Item number 1277187 Part number 9419. The website that I found it on is CDW Government, Inc.

The programmatic focus area for this year`s grants: Low Performing Students (Reading.

1. Need for Innovation
2. Objectives of Innovation
3. Activities designed to meet objectives
4. Proposed Evaluation of Objectives
5. Additional information

Please add how scores will go up with using an Elmo and how it will help low functioning students.

please be advised ,it is an essay on grant deeds leagal discription do your best please included 500 words thanks

Research available grants that pertain to any field in which you wish to obtain more information about to understand how they are funded.

In this assignment:
Detail the grant process (government grants)
Distinguish different cost structures that will be covered under the grant and those legacy or hidden costs which may not be covered
Include in this what information you would need to receive the grant and overall observations on process and availability of grants.

For example a college or trade school grant or a reseach grant

Customer is requesting that (WORDSTRESS1) completes this order.